Balci, OsmanMahmoud, Alaa S.Acar, AliColakoglu, Mehmet C.2020-03-262020-03-2620111476-70581476-4954https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.531798https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26257Objective. To compare the efficacy and complications of intravaginal misoprostol application before starting oxytocin infusion with oxytocin infusion alone for labor induction in term primigravidae pregnancies with low-Bishop score. Methods. This randomized study included 101 primigravidae women with singleton pregnancies >38 weeks and a Bishop score of <6. Group 1 (50 patients) received a 50-mu g dose of intravaginal misoprostol, with an oxytocin infusion started 3 h later. Group 2 (51 patients) received only an oxytocin infusion for labor induction. The time from induction to delivery, the route of delivery and complications were analyzed. Results. The mean time from induction to delivery was 10.4 +/- 2.1 h in Group 1 and 13.7 +/- 3.4 in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The rates of vaginal delivery, Apgar scores at 1st and 5th min, placental abniption, and postpartum hemorrhage were similar between the two groups. Conclusion. Intravaginal application of 50-mu g misoprostol before starting oxytocin infusion is a more effective method of labor induction than oxytocin infusion alone in term primigravidae pregnant women with low-Bishop scores.en10.3109/14767058.2010.531798info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessLabor inductionmisoprostoloxytocinArticle2491084108721087166Q2WOS:000294742100002Q3