Ozcan, ErhanYula, ErkanArslanoglu, ZekiInci, Melek2020-03-262020-03-2620130001-63571502-3850https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.771405https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/29225Objective. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antifungal activity of several root canal sealers (iRoot SP, MTA Fillapex and GuttaFlow) against Candida albicans and compare them to that of AH Plus Jet. Materials and methods. A10 mu L fungi in suspension was allowed to directly contact the sealers, which were freshly mixed or allowed to set for 1 or 7 days. Fresh media was then added and survival of fungi was determined by using 10-fold serial dilution and inoculated onto agar plates. After incubation for 48 h, colony-forming units (CFU) were calculated and their log(10) values converted. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (alpha = 0.05). Results. Freshly mixed AH Plus Jet totally inhibited the growth of fungi and showed the highest antifungal activity. GuttaFlow did not show any significant antifungal activity at all times. Freshly mixed iRoot SP and MTA Fillapex were found to be antifungal. Statistical differences were found between freshly mixed and set samples (p < 0.05) in favor of the former, except GuttaFlow. No statistically significant differences were found among the tested sealers at the 1 and 7-day samples (p > 0.05). Conclusions. Fresh AH Plus Jet had very potent antifungal activity. All sealers, except GuttaFlow, exhibited antifungal activity when freshly mixed.en10.3109/00016357.2013.771405info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessAH Plus Jetantifungal activityGuttaFlowiRoot SPMTA FillapexArticle7161481148524180589Q2WOS:000326678700020Q2