Yazar "Cobankara, FK" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Evaluation of the influence of smear layer on the apical and coronal sealing ability of two sealers(ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2004) Cobankara, FK; Adanir, N; Belli, SThe aim of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of the smear layer on apical and coronal leakage in root canals obturated with AH26 or RoekoSeal sealers. A total of 160 maxillary anterior teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were used. The root canals were prepared to a size #7 with ProFile .06 taper Series 29 rotary instruments in a crown-down manner. Eight groups were created by all possible combinations of three factors: smear layer (present/absent), leakage assessment (apical/coronal), and sealer used (AH26/RoekoSeal). All teeth were obturated using lateral condensation technique of gutta-percha. A fluid filtration method was used to test apical or coronal leak age. According to the results of this study, the smear (+) groups displayed higher apical and coronal leakage than those smear (-) groups for both root canal sealers (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in either apical or coronal leakage between RoekoSeal and AH26, regardless of the presence or absence of the smear layer (p > 0.05). However, apical leakage was significantly higher than coronal leakage for both root canal sealers used in this study (p < 0.05). Under the conditions of this study, the results indicate that removal of the smear layer has a positive effect in reducing apical and coronal leakage for both AH26 and RoekoSeal root canal sealers.Öğe Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems(MOSBY-ELSEVIER, 2004) Usumez, A; Cobankara, FK; Ozturk, N; Eskitascioglu, G; Belli, SStatement of problem. Several new esthetic dowel systems are available for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, but little is known about how effectively these dowels seal the restored teeth. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare microleakage of 3 esthetic, adhesively luted dowel systems with a conventional dowel system. Material and methods. The root canals of 41 human intact single-rooted extracted teeth were prepared using a step-back technique. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n=10), and I tooth served as a positive control. The decoronated roots were obturated with gutta-percha using lateral condensation. Roots were restored with I of the following dowel systems according to the manufacturer's instructions: (1) stainless steel dowels (ParaPost), (2) glass fiber dowels (Snowpost), (3) resin-supported polyethylene fiber (Ribbond) dowels, or (4) zirconia dowels (Cosmopost). Using a fluid filtration method, coronal leakage of the specimens along the dowel space and root canal restorative material was measured. Fluid movement measurements were made at 2-minute intervals for 8 minutes to measure the presence of voids existing in the obturated canals, at I week, 3 months, and 6 months following dowel insertion. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze logarithmic transformations of data (time and dowel material) for significant differences. The Tukey HSD test and paired 2-tailed tests were used to perform multiple comparisons (alpha=.05). Results. The data indicated that the leakage values varied according to the dowel system used (P<.01). There was significant interaction between dowel systems and time of testing (P<.01). The sealing ability of zirconia dowels decreased over time (P<.01), but sealing abilities of stainless steel and resin-supported polyethylene fiber dowels remained constant (P>.05). The sealing ability of glass fiber dowels increased at 3 months (P=.032) and remained constant over the next 3 months (P=.758). Statistically, resin-supported polyethylene fiber and glass fiber dowels showed the lowest coronal leakage when compared with stainless steel and zirconia dowels at all time periods (P<.01). There were no significant differences between resin-supported polyethylene fiber and glass fiber dowels at any time period. The initial leakage measurement in zirconia dowel and stainless steel dowels were similar (P=.914), but became significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P<.01). Conclusion. Resin-supported polyethylene fiber dowels and glass fiber dowels tested exhibited less microleakage compared to zirconia dowel systems. The latter system should be further evaluated because of its unacceptable level of leakage.Öğe The quantitative evaluation of apical sealing of four endodontic sealers(ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2006) Cobankara, FK; Orucoglu, H; Sengun, A; Belli, SThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the apical seal obtained with four root canal sealers: Rocanal 2, Sealapex, AH Plus, and RC Sealer. Forty root canals were prepared using the step-back technique. The specimens were divided into four groups of 10 samples and obturated by laterally condensed gutta-percha with one of the tested sealers. The computerized fluid filtration method was used for evaluation of apical sealing properties. The quantitative apical leakage of each specimen was measured after 7, 14, and 21 days. Statistical analysis indicated that the apical leakage of all sealers used in this study decreased gradually from 7 days to 21 days (p < 0.05). Sealapex showed better apical sealing than the other sealers at 7, 14, and 21 days (p < 0.05). RC Sealer, AH Plus, and Rocanal 2 showed similar apical leakage values at every period (p > 0.05).Öğe Sealing properties of different resin-based root canal sealers(WILEY, 2006) Adanir, N; Cobankara, FK; Belli, SIn this study, a comparison of the sealing properties of three different resin-based sealers, AH26, Diaket, and EndoREZ with those of the root canal sealer zinc oxide-eugenol-based U/P Root Canal Sealer was performed. Eighty extracted single-rooted human mandibular first premolar teeth were used. The coronal part of each tooth was removed at the apical 17-mm of roots. The root canals were prepared to a size 7 with ProFile 0.06 taper Series 29 rotary instruments in a crown-down manner before lateral condensation of gutta-percha with the tested sealers (n = 20). A fluid filtration method was used for quantitative evaluation of apical leakage. Statistical analysis revealed that there were no significant differences between the resin-based sealers groups (AH26, Diaket, and EndoREZ) (P > 0.05). UIP Root Canal Sealer, zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer, leaked significantly more than other tested groups (p < 0.05). Under the limitations of this study, resin-based root canal sealers were found more effective in sealing root canals than the zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals. Inc.
