Yazar "Inan G." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Comparison of gamma analysis in multiple static segment and sliding window techniques in nasopharyngeal radiotherapy
    (American Institute of Physics Inc., 2019) Inan G.; Gül V.; Yavaş G.; Yavaş Ç.; O?ul R.
    The purpose of this study was to compare gamma an alysis by using portal dosimetry (PD) between static (SMLC) and dynamic (DMLC) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. Simultane Integrated Boost (SIB) treatment plans were created using four treatment volumes (PTV-54, PTV-59.4, PTV-66, PTV-70) for 10 patients with nasopharyngeal car cinoma. The treatment plans were performed using Varian DHX eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 15.1. Six out of ten patients treatment plans were planned with 7 fields IMRT technique using the ganrty angels of 0°, 52°, 104°, 156°, 204°, 256° and 308°. The remaining four patients treatment plans were planned using 9 fields IMRT technique with the gantry angles 0°, 40°, 80°, 120°,160°, 200°, 240°, 280° and 320°. A total dose 6996 cGy in 33 fractions were given and the dose calculation were performed using SW and MMS technique. The plans were measured by aS500 EPID integrated into Varian DHX linear accelerator. Dose distributions images were obtained. Gamma analyses were evaluated using different ? criteria (2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm and 4%/4 mm) for the 6 MV photon beams. Gamma analysis was performed by using Portal Dosimetry software in 2, 3, 4 mm distance to agreement and 2%, 3% and 4% dose difference criteria and their algorithms were compared. When compared the calculated and measured dose distributions images of the gamma analyses the average result for SW technique in 7 fields for gamma criteria 2/2%, 3/3% 4/4% were 98.64±0.34 99.36±0.22 99.74±0.11 and 9 fields for the gamma criteria 2/2%, 3/3% 4/4% were 96,90±0.70 98,98±0,33 99,60±0,31 respectively. The average result for MMS technique in 7 fields for the gamma criteria 2/2%, 3/3% 4/4 were 97.46±0.22 98.92±0.39 99.42±0.18 and 9 fields for the gamma criteria 2/2%, 3/3% 4/4% were 94.94±1.13, 97.74±0.33, 98.82±0.24 respectively. SW and MMS techniques showed comparable results with the respect to gamma analysis so but both techniques are suitable for the gamma analysis criteria. © 2019 Author(s).
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Comparison of multiple static segment and sliding window techniques in prostate radiotherapy
    (American Institute of Physics Inc., 2019) Inan G.; Gül V.; Yavaş G.; Yavaş Ç.; O?ul R.
    The purpose of this study is to compare multiple static segment (step and shoot) and sliding window techniques in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Ten definitive prostate patients were included in this study. For each patients, two different treatment plans were created. Multiple static segment and sliding window techniques were compared doses in the planning tardet volume (PTV), the organ at risk (OAR) volumes including rectum dose (V50, V35, V25, V20 and V10), bladder dose (V50, V35, V25 and V15), femoral heads mean and maksimum doses, homogeneity index (DHI) and the monitor unit counts (MU) for the treatment. Gamma analysis was performed by using portal dosimetry software in 2 and 3 distance to agreement and 2% and 3% dose difference criteria and their algorithms were compared. Coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) was showed similar results for both sliding window and step and shoot IMRT, however significant differences were found critical organ doses and total monitor unit (MU). Rectum and bladder mean doses for the sliding window and step and shoot plans were 43.37±10.89, 40.03±12.61 and 42.62±10.22, 39.20±12 and the mean MUs were 1014 cGy and 867 cGy respectively. Homogeneity index (HI) was 0.038±0.01 and 0.079±0.001 for SW and MSS techniques. When compared the calculated and measured dose distributions images of the gamma analyses the average result 2/2% and 3/3% were 97.46±1.34, 99.63±0.82 and 98.16± 0.27, 99.33±0.17 for both the sliding window and step and shoot techniques respectively. Two techniques allowed more homogeneous dose distributions in PTV. Considering the dose to organs at risk (OAR) and total MU, MSS technique seems to be advantages than the sliding window. SW and MMS techniques showed comparable results with the respect to gamma analysis. © 2019 Author(s).