Yazar "Yapar, K." seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Enrofloxacin and Tissue Concentrations of Parent Drug and Ciprofloxacin After Intramuscular Administrations of Free and Liposome-encapsulated Enrofloxacin in Rabbits(BLACKWELL VERLAG GMBH, 2002) Elmas, Muammer; Yazar, Enver; Baş, A.L.; Traş, Bünyamin; Bayezit, M.; Yapar, K.Pharmacokinetic properties and tissue concentrations of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were compared after intramuscular (i.m.) administrations of free and liposome-encapsulated enrofloxacin at the dose of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw). Twelve healthy adult New Zealand white rabbits were used in the experiment. Blood samples were obtained at 10, 20, 40, 60 and 90 min and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h and tissue samples were collected 24 h after injection. Concentrations of drugs in serum were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment open model. Results indicated that absorption rate was slow, peak concentration was higher (P<0.05), and the time to peak concentration (t(max) congruent to 1.5 h) was significantly longer (P<0.05) for liposome-encapsulated enrofloxacin (LEE) when compared with free enrofloxacin. Values of elimination half-life (t(1/2beta)=12.9 h) and mean residence time (MRT=17.6 h) of liposome-encapsulated enrofloxacin were longer (P<0.05) and total clearance (Cl = 0.43 l/h/kg) was lower than those of free form. Moreover, the distribution volume at steady-state (V-d(ss)=14.4 l/kg) of enrofloxacin administered encapsulated into liposomes was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of free enrofloxacin (FE). The tissue levels of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin after LEE injection were not different (P>0.05) from FE. In conclusion, the result of present study suggest that LEE may be a beneficial and valuable formulation in the treatment of infectious diseases caused by sensitive pathogens in animals, providing sustained drug release from injection side and prolonged therapeutic serum concentrations after i.m. administration.Öğe Farklı Aydınlatma Süreleri?ni?n Sülünleri?n (P.colchicus) Bazı Veri?mleri? Üzeri?ne Etki?leri?(Selçuk Üniversitesi, 2000) Tepeli, C.; Çetin, O.; Yapar, K.; Yılmaz, R.; Kırıkçı, K.This study has been conducted to investigate the effects of exposing pheasants to different light periods on their egg production characteristics and hatching traits. The daily light period was increased from 11 h light (L) 14 h darkness (D) initially to 16 h L 8h D in group 1. Birds were exposed to 16 h L 8hD and 8 h L 8h D: 8h L periods in groups 2 and 3 respectively. Following the onset of stimulatory light, the first egg was obtained in 23 and 22 days in groups 1.2 and 3 respectively Egg production periods of pheasants were determined as 138 and 136 days in groups 1.2 and 3. Egg yields of pheasants in groups were found as 40.28, 56.57 and 67.68 egg/pheasant respectively (P < 0.05) Average values of hatchability fertility and hatchability of fertil eggs were determined as 39.48, 48.40 and 54.09 < (P < 0.05) ; 62 17 68 15 and 70.47% (P < 0.05) 63.50, 71.01 and 76.76 % (P < 0.05) in groups respectively.