Patient-Controlled Femoral Nerve Analgesia Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia After Trochanteric Fracture Repair

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Sema
dc.contributor.authorSert, Özlem Akkoyun
dc.contributor.authorYosunkaya, Alper
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Jale
dc.contributor.authorÖkesli, Selmin
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:46:38Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:46:38Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and femoral nerve PCA after trochanteric fracture repair. A total of 40 patient were randomised to receive either femoral nerve PCA (Group I) or intravenous (IV) PCA (Group II) in the postoperative period. Group I received a continuous infusion of 0.125 bupivacaine at rate of 4 ml h-1 plus PCA boluses of 3 ml with lockout time of 20 min. Morphine by IV PCA was applied as 1 mg bolus dose and 7 min lockout time in Group II. Pain scores (active-passive movement and during the resting), side effects, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Pain scores at rest were similar in both groups. Significantly better pain control at movement was observed in the Group I. Side effects were observed significantly more frequently in the Group II. Patient satisfaction was greater in Group I. Of the two PCA techniques tested, femoral nerve PCA with continuous infusion provides greater patient comfort both at rest and with ambulation than does IV PCA. © 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTuncer, S., Akkoyun Sert, Ö., Yosunkaya, A., Mutlu, M., Çelik, J., Ökesli, S., (2003). Patient-Controlled Femoral Nerve Analgesia Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia After Trochanteric Fracture Repair. Acute Pain, (4), 105-108. Doi: 10.1016/S1366-0071(03)00004-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1366-0071(03)00004-4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage108en_US
dc.identifier.issn1366-0071en_US
dc.identifier.issue03.04.2020en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage105en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1366-0071(03)00004-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/18700
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorTuncer, Sema
dc.institutionauthorAkkoyun Sert, Özlem
dc.institutionauthorYosunkaya, Alper
dc.institutionauthorMutlu, Mahmut
dc.institutionauthorÇelik, Jale
dc.institutionauthorÖkesli, Selmin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAcute Painen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Controlled Analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Painen_US
dc.subjectVisual Analogue Scaleen_US
dc.titlePatient-Controlled Femoral Nerve Analgesia Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia After Trochanteric Fracture Repair en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
tuncer2003.pdf
Boyut:
78.18 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon/Makale Koleksiyonu
Ortopedi ve Travmataloji/Makale Koleksiyonu