Adhesion of two new glass fiber post systems cemented with self-adhesive resin cements
dc.contributor.author | Özlek E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Neelakantan P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Matinlinna J.P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Belli S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ugur M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kavut I. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T20:19:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T20:19:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material. © 2019 by the authors. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/dj7030080 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2304-6767 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7030080 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/38410 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Dentistry Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Adhesion | en_US |
dc.subject | Bond strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Glass fiber post | en_US |
dc.subject | Push out | en_US |
dc.subject | Resin cement | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-adhesive | en_US |
dc.title | Adhesion of two new glass fiber post systems cemented with self-adhesive resin cements | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |