The Stoppa approach versus the ilio-inguinal approach for anterior acetabular fractures: A case control study assessing blood loss complications and function outcomes

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorElmadağ, M.
dc.contributor.authorGüzel, Y.
dc.contributor.authorAcar, M. Ali
dc.contributor.authorUzer, G.
dc.contributor.authorArazi, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:59:17Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The modified Stoppa approach was introduced to manage fracture of the anterior column instead of the ilio-inguinal approach to reduce morbidity. However, there is no clinical evidence to confirm its efficiency. Therefore, this study was designed to ascertain: (1) if the Stoppa approach versus ilio-inguinal allows less blood loss? (2) if functional and radiological results are superior to that of the ilio-inguinal approach? (3) if the rate of complication was different. Hypothesis: The modified Stoppa approach allows less blood loss than the ilio-inguinal in management of fractures of the anterior column of the acetabulum. Patients and methods: Nineteen patients who were treated with the ilio-inguinal approach (Group A) at a mean follow-up of 33 months and 17 patients who were treated with the modified Stoppa approach (Group B) at a mean follow-up of 28.9 months were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were called to the final follow-up examination, mean follow-up durations were set and the functional evaluation of patients was made with measurement of range of motion, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), and Merle D'Aubigné score. Results: Average blood loss was determined at a mean 1170. mL (range, 750-2150. mL) in group A and at a mean 1110. mL (range, 450-2000. mL) in group B (p= 0.168). The mean HHS (group A. = 89.4 (73-99) and group B. = 88.4 (75-97)) and Merle D'Aubigné scores (group A. = 16.8 (13-18) and group B. = 16.5 (13-18)) showed no significant difference between the groups (p= 0.169). At the final follow-up, the mean hip flexion was found to be 106.83. ±. 12.47 and the hip extension was 10.33. ±. 6.12 in group A, while these values were 103.71. ±. 14.32 and 10.69. ±. 8.17 in group B (NS between groups regarding flexion (p= 0.678) and extension (p= 0.445)). The complication rate was 31% in group A (6 patients) and 23% in group B (4 patients) (p>. 0.05). Discussion: Both surgical approaches give successful results in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Contrary to expectations, there was no difference in the amount of bleeding at the wound site from the Stoppa technique, even though it is minimally invasive, compared to the ilio-inguinal approach. Level of evidence: Level III. Retrospective case control study. © 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rcot.2014.06.021en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-0517en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2014.06.021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/31471
dc.identifier.volume100en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Masson SASen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRevue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologiqueen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAcetabulumen_US
dc.subjectAcetabulum fracturesen_US
dc.subjectIlio-inguinalen_US
dc.subjectModified Stoppaen_US
dc.titleThe Stoppa approach versus the ilio-inguinal approach for anterior acetabular fractures: A case control study assessing blood loss complications and function outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu