Comparison of different interpolation techniques in determining of agricultural soil index on land consolidation projects
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2019
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
SELCUK UNIV PRESS
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Land consolidation (LC) is a tool to improve the processing efficiency of agricultural area and the promotion of rural development same time an indispensable application for the promotion of sustainable agriculture. In order to achieve the reallocation process after LC, determining the correct of soil index (SI) for each of the agricultural parcels is very important for the success of LC projects. Nowadays, interpolation methods are extensively applied in the mapping processes to estimate the SI at unsampled sites. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three interpolation methods for the agricultural SI values maps with GIS technology for LC projects. The SI data were determined from 132 observation points. Three spatial interpolation methods Ordinary Kriging (OK), Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), and Radial Basis Functions (RBFs) were utilized for modeling the agricultural SI values. The results indicated that all methods provided a high prediction accuracy of the mean concentration of SI. In this study, although the best performed interpolation method was the OK, the results showed that the performance differed slightly among three methods. Results show that all the methods present a good performance in the estimation with RMSE (root mean square error) and ME (mean error) close to 0%.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Land consolidation (LC), Soil index (SI), Ordinary Kriging (OK), Inverse Distance weighting (IDW), Radial Basis Functions (RBFs)
Kaynak
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCES
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
4
Sayı
1
Künye
Uyan, M. (2019). Comparison of Different Interpolation Techniques in Determining of Agricultural Soil Index on Land Consolidation Projects. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4(1), 28-35.
