Mechanical behaviours of masonry walls constructed with different methods under reverse-cycling loads

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇöğürcü, M. Tolga
dc.contributor.authorDöndüren, M. Sami
dc.contributor.authorKamanlı, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKani, Recep
dc.contributor.authorAltın, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:22:16Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:22:16Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, experiments were performed to examine the behaviours of a masonry wall constructed with normal mortar (reference wall), masonry wall constructed with mortal, the binding property of which is improved with additive (model wall), masonry wall constructed with normal mortar, by application of horizontal joint reinforcement with epoxy resin-FRP, under reverse-cycling earthquake loads. For this reason, 3 different prototype walls were produced which had the same geometrical properties with exact dimensions. The results of mechanical behaviours such as first crack, failure behaviour, ductility, energy consumption formed in these walls were investigated and compared. As a result, it was observed that masonry walls failure by forming failure lines are similar to yield lines formed in reinforced concrete floor under reverse-cycling out of plane loads, the kind of failure is brittle and they do not have the ductility that yield lines have. It was also observed that, model wall and the wall constructed by application of horizontal joint reinforcement with epoxy resin-FRP provided more strength by 25% increase than reference wall. Moreover, it was determined that, the ductility in reference wall is 41% more than the one in model wall and 48% more than the wall reinforced with epoxy resin-FRP and the reference wall consumes 25 and 22% more energy than the model wall and the wall reinforced with epoxy resin-FRP, respectively. All these studies showed that when this method is applied, an increase in strength and a decrease in ductility could be obtained against earthquakes. In other words, while the construction gets reinforced against earthquakes, its failure (rigidity) increases. ©2011 Academic Journals.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1488en_US
dc.identifier.issn1992-2248en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage1479en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/27254
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Research and Essaysen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAdditiveen_US
dc.subjectConstructionen_US
dc.subjectEarthquakeen_US
dc.subjectFRPen_US
dc.subjectMasonryen_US
dc.subjectMechanical behaviouren_US
dc.subjectReverse-cycling loaden_US
dc.titleMechanical behaviours of masonry walls constructed with different methods under reverse-cycling loadsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu