Influence of the bulk fill restorative technique on microleakage and microtensile of class II restorations
dc.contributor.author | Koyutürk, Alp Erdin | |
dc.contributor.author | Tokay, Uğur | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarı, M. Erhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Özmen, Bilal | |
dc.contributor.author | Cortcu, Murat | |
dc.contributor.author | Acar, Hamdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Ülker, Mustafa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T18:59:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T18:59:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background & Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate microleakage and bond strength test of the bulk fill restorative technique. Materials and methods: ÆLITE LS Posterior and SureFil SDR flow were used as composite restoration, and Clearfil S3 (Self Etch system) Bond and Prime&Bond NT (Total Etch system) were used as bonding agents. Standardized Class II cavities were made on sixty extracted premolar teeth and they were randomly divided into four groups. Thermo-cycling and mechanical loading was applied to all samples. The samples were stored in the %2 basic fuchsine solutions and the microleakage was evaluated. Results: When total etching system groups were evaluated, the cervical microleakage values were higher than occlusal microleakage values on both composites (P < 0.05), but there were no differences between the self-etch groups. Microtensile test was also applied to the samples. When the MPa values of all groups were compared, there was a very significant difference statistically (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The results support the conclusion that the SureFil SDR flow exhibited the best performance in occlusal margins of Prime&Bond NT-SureFil SDR groups. Copyright © 2014 The Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.pdj.2014.07.002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 152 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0917-2394 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 148 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2014.07.002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/31428 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 24 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Pediatric Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Composite dental resin | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental stress analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Microleakage | en_US |
dc.subject | SureFil SDR flow | en_US |
dc.subject | Tensile strength | en_US |
dc.title | Influence of the bulk fill restorative technique on microleakage and microtensile of class II restorations | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |