Comparison of root and shoot traits of different wheat species and wild wheat relatives: Does feature of shoot biomass have positive and significant relationships with grain yield and root traits?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Hayati
dc.contributor.authorAkgün, Necdet
dc.contributor.authorTamkoç, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:34:30Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:34:30Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study targeted to investigate some root and shoot traits and their relationship in 47 different genotypes such as cultivars, lines, landraces, ancient wheat species and wild wheat relatives belonging to 14 different species at long tubes of PVC under field weather conditions. It was found significant differences between genotypes in terms of root and shoot traits (P < 0.01). The investigated traits varied among the genotypes, ranging from 0.97 to 6.88 g for root biomass, 0.07 to 0.34 for root to shoot ratio, 5.9 to 25.0% for root to total biomass ratio, 4.3 to 34.7 for tiller number and 7.5 to 52.6 g for shoot biomass. Ancient wheat species such as Triticum monococcum (Kelycras), T. turgidum, T. spelta, a landrace (Vanli), and cultivars (Daws High PPO, ARS Amber and AK 702) had large root biomass among the genotypes. Therefore, these genotypes could be helpful forimproving genotypes with large root system in breeding programs. The study also showed that shoot biomass had significant and positive relationships with root biomass (0.572**), root length (0.441**) and crown root number (0.245**) as well as grain yield (0.911**). Accordingly, feature of shoot biomass might be used as selection criteria in breeding program to improve genotypes with superior root system and high grain yield.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship[13401004]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe projects this study under the grant (No 13401004). The data presented in this article was produced within the projects above; however, only the authors of this article are responsible for the results and discussions made herein. The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Ali Topal for TR 053 '1', TR 062 wheat lines and landraces, Prof. Dr. Phil Bruckner for Montana cultivars and USDA Ars-Grin for abroad genotypes.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage447en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-7818en_US
dc.identifier.issn2477-9407en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage428en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/34908
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000417238100002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUNIV ZULIA, FACULTAD AGRONOMIAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofREVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE AGRONOMIA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectwheat speciesen_US
dc.subjectwild wheat relativesen_US
dc.subjectroot and shoot traitsen_US
dc.subjectcorrelationen_US
dc.titleComparison of root and shoot traits of different wheat species and wild wheat relatives: Does feature of shoot biomass have positive and significant relationships with grain yield and root traits?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu