A Comparison of Ropivacaine With Bupivacaine for Pediatric Caudal Block [çocuklarda Kaudal Blok Uygulanmasinda Bupivakain I?le Ropivakainin Karşilaştirilmasi]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, S.
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, R.
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, J.
dc.contributor.authorReisli, Ruhiye
dc.contributor.authorTavlan, A.
dc.contributor.authorÖkesli, Selmin
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:37:34Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:37:34Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractCaudal anaesthesia is a widely used method for lower abdominal, penoscrotal and lower extremity surgery in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of anaesthesia, the effects on hemodynamic parameters, postoperative pain and side effects of ropivacaine and bupivakaine in caudal anaesthesia. All patients received rectal midazolam 0.4 mg/kg for premedication 30 minutes before surgery. After routine monitorization, patients were randomized into two groups. All patients received 2-2.5 mg/kg bolus propofol intravenously and then propofol infusion was continued through the operation. Immediately after propofol bolus Group I (n=20) received 2 mg/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and Group II (n=20) received 2 mg/kg 0.2% ropivacaine for caudal anaesthesia. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, SpO2 was measured 5 and 15 minutes after caudal blockade and every 15 minutes until discharged from the operating room. Postoperative pain was assessed according to Modified Pediatric Objective Pain Scale (MPOPS). The level of anaesthesia was satisfactory in both groups. No further analgesia was required. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, SpO2 and the values of MPOPS were similar in both groups. 45% of Group I and 40% of Group II didn't need postoperative analgesia. As a result, we concluded that ropivacaine (2 mg/kg 0.2%) is as efficacious as bupivacaine (2 mg/kg 0.25%) anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia for caudal anesthesia in children.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTuncer, S., Orhan, R., Çelik, J., Reisli, R., Tavlan, A., Ökesli, S., (2001). A Comparison of Ropivacaine With Bupivacaine for Pediatric Caudal Block [çocuklarda Kaudal Blok Uygulanmasinda Bupivakain I?le Ropivakainin Karşilaştirilmasi]. Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon, 29(10), 551-556.
dc.identifier.endpage556en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5150en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage551en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/17649
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorTuncer, S.
dc.institutionauthorOrhan, R.
dc.institutionauthorÇelik, J.
dc.institutionauthorReisli, Ruhiye
dc.institutionauthorTavlan, A.
dc.institutionauthorÖkesli, Selmin
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectBupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectCaudal anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectRopivacaineen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Ropivacaine With Bupivacaine for Pediatric Caudal Block [çocuklarda Kaudal Blok Uygulanmasinda Bupivakain I?le Ropivakainin Karşilaştirilmasi]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon/Makale Koleksiyonu