The effects of spinal neddle on skin puncture pain during spinal anesthesia for caesarian sections: Comparison of 26G Quincke and 26G atraumatic spinal needles

dc.contributor.authorSargin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorCebeci, Zubeyir
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:44:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:44:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Skin puncture pain during spinal anesthesia is the reason of wincing from spinal anesthesia in many patients. In this study we aimed to compare the effect of two different spinal needles on skin puncture pain during spinal anesthesia for caesarian sections.Material and Methods: Eighty pregnant women scheduled to undergo elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia were studied. Spinal anesthesia was induced with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10-15 mg via a 26G Quincke (Group Q, n40) or 26G atraumatic (Group A, n40) spinal needle in the sitting position at the L3–4 or L4-5 vertebral level using median approach. Skin puncture pain during spinal anesthesia was assessed on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means refers no pain and 10 the worst possible pain (0 no, 1–3 mild, 4–6 moderate, 7–10 severe).Results: Skin puncture pain VAS values, median (range) [IQR], were 2(1-5)[1-3] in Group Q and 2(1-7)[1-3] in Group A. There were no statistically differences between the groups (p0.707).Conclusion: We believe that Quincke and Atraumatic spinal needles don’t have any difference in terms of skin puncture pain during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSargın, M., Toprak, H., Cebeci, Z. (2018). The Effects of Spinal Neddle on Skin Puncture Pain During Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarian Sections : Comparison of 26G Quincke and 26G atraumatic spinal needles. Annals of Medical Research, 25(4), 545-548.
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.06.105en_US
dc.identifier.endpage548en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage545en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.06.105
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TWprMk5UQTVPUT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/35869
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.institutionauthorSargin, Mehmet
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAcil Tıpen_US
dc.subjectAdli Tıpen_US
dc.subjectAlerjien_US
dc.subjectAnestezien_US
dc.subjectBiyokimya ve Moleküler Biyolojien_US
dc.subjectCerrahien_US
dc.subjectEndokrinoloji ve Metabolizmaen_US
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetlerien_US
dc.subjectTıpen_US
dc.subjectSkin Puncture Pain
dc.subjectSpinal Anesthesia
dc.subjectSpinal Needle
dc.subjectCaesarian Sections
dc.titleThe effects of spinal neddle on skin puncture pain during spinal anesthesia for caesarian sections: Comparison of 26G Quincke and 26G atraumatic spinal needlesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Mehmet SARGIN.pdf
Boyut:
262.36 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama: