Panoramik radyografide yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyonlarının görülme sıklığı
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2020
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Panoramik radyografide yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyon prevalansını saptamak ve tiplere göre dağılımını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Farklı sebeplerle alınan 1024 panoramik radyografide yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyon varlığı incelendi. Kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyon görüldüğünde lokalizasyon ve şekline göre tipi belirlendi. Hastaların yaş ve cinsiyetleri ile kalsifiye aterosklerotik plak varlığında sistemik durumu kayıt edildi. Bulgular: Yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyon tespit edilen hastaların % 31.45’i stilohyoid ligament ossifikasyonu, % 26,15’i kalsifiye aterosklerotik plak, % 14.84’ü tonsillolit, % 13.43’ü birden fazla yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyonu, % 12.72’si tritiseöz kartilaj kalsifikasyonu, % 1.06’sı lenf nodu kalsifikasyonu ve % 0.35’i submandibular sialolit olarak dağılım gösterdi. Kalsifiye aterosklerotik plak görülen hastaların % 29.3’ünde hipertansiyon, % 10.1’inde ise Tip II diyabet mevcuttu. Kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyon sıklığı ile cinsiyet ve sistemik hastalık arası ilişki ki-kare ve Fisher kesin testi ile değerlendirildi (p<0.05). Sonuç: En fazla stilohyoid ligament ossifikasyonu izlendi. Yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyonları kadınlarda daha fazla görüldü ve görülme sıklığı yaşla birlikte arttı.
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of soft tissue calcification/ossification on panoramic radiography and to determine its distribution by type. Methods: On 1024 panoramic radiographs taken for different reasons, the presence of soft tissue calcification/ossification was examined. When calcification/ossification was seen, type was determined according to localization and shape. Age and gender of the patients were recorded and systemic status was noted in the presence of calcified atherosclerotic plaque. Results: The distribution of soft tissue calcification/ossifications were 31.45% stilohyoid ligament ossification, 26.15% calcified atherosclerotic plaque, 14.84% tonsillolith, 13.43% multiple soft tissue calcification/ossification, 12.72% tritiseous cartilage calcification, 1.06% lymph node calcification and 0.35% submandibular sialolith. 29.3% of patients with calcified atherosclerotic plaques had hypertension and 10.1% had type II diabetes. The association of presence of calcification with gender and systemic condition was analyzed with the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test (P<0.05). Conclusion: The most common calcification/ossifications type stilohyoid ligament ossification was observed. Soft tissue calcification/ossifications were more common in female and incidence increased with age.
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of soft tissue calcification/ossification on panoramic radiography and to determine its distribution by type. Methods: On 1024 panoramic radiographs taken for different reasons, the presence of soft tissue calcification/ossification was examined. When calcification/ossification was seen, type was determined according to localization and shape. Age and gender of the patients were recorded and systemic status was noted in the presence of calcified atherosclerotic plaque. Results: The distribution of soft tissue calcification/ossifications were 31.45% stilohyoid ligament ossification, 26.15% calcified atherosclerotic plaque, 14.84% tonsillolith, 13.43% multiple soft tissue calcification/ossification, 12.72% tritiseous cartilage calcification, 1.06% lymph node calcification and 0.35% submandibular sialolith. 29.3% of patients with calcified atherosclerotic plaques had hypertension and 10.1% had type II diabetes. The association of presence of calcification with gender and systemic condition was analyzed with the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test (P<0.05). Conclusion: The most common calcification/ossifications type stilohyoid ligament ossification was observed. Soft tissue calcification/ossifications were more common in female and incidence increased with age.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kalsifikasyon, panoramik radyografi, prevalans, Calcification, panoramic radiography, prevalence
Kaynak
Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
7
Sayı
2
Künye
Çitir, M., Gündüz, K., (2020). Panoramik radyografide yumuşak doku kalsifikasyon/ossifikasyonlarının görülme sıklığı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (2), 226-232. Doi: 10.15311/selcukdentj.539152
