How to manage intrauterine growth restriction associated with severe preeclampsia at 28-34 weeks of gestation?
dc.contributor.author | Gezginç, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Acar, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peru, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Karataylı, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Çelik, Ç. | |
dc.contributor.author | Çapar, M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T17:28:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T17:28:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To propose optimal management of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) cases associated with severe preeclampsia at 28-34 weeks of gestation. Methods: Two hundred pregnant women with severe preeclampsia associated with growth restricted fetuses were followed with doppler velocimetry of umbilical artery between 28-34 weeks of pregnancy. Patients were grouped according to indications for termination of pregnancy, first group consisted of severely affected doppler velocity waveforms (n:100) and the second group consisted of those whose cardiotocography and biophysic profile were unfavorable (n:100). Groups were compared according to perinatal outcomes (cesarean rates, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores and demand for intubation and perinatal deaths). Results: The diagnosis to delivery interval is significantly higher in the second group (p<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between groups regarding gestational age at delivery and parity (p>0.05). Apgar scores were lower in the first group (p<0.05), and there was increased demand for intubation. Perinatal deaths were also lower in the second group (p<0.05). Cesarean rate was significantly lower compared with first group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Assessment of doppler velocimetry alone may not be enough at decision for termination of pregnancy, biophysic profile and cardiotocography should be added to confirm exact time for delivery of a premature fetus and to improve perinatal outcomes. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 215 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1304-3889 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 212 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22879 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 5 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of General Medicine | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Biophysic profile | en_US |
dc.subject | Doppler velocimetry | en_US |
dc.subject | Intrauterine growth restriction | en_US |
dc.subject | Perinatal outcomes | en_US |
dc.subject | Severe preeclampsia | en_US |
dc.title | How to manage intrauterine growth restriction associated with severe preeclampsia at 28-34 weeks of gestation? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |