Beğavî'nin Meâlimü't-Tenzîl İsimli Tefsirindeki Hadislerin Tahriç ve Değerlendirilmesi (Kehf, Taha, Meryem ve Enbiyâ Sûreleri)
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2023
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Araştırmamızda, Beğavî’nin rivayet türü tefsir olarak kaleme aldığı ve en
meşhur telifi olan Meâlimü’t-Tenzîl adlı eserinde Kehf, Meryem, Tâhâ ve Enbiyâ
sûrelerini tefsir ederken aktarmış olduğu rivayetler incelendi. İncelemiş olduğumuz
rivayetler müellifin eserinde senedi bakımından isnadlı-isnadsız, sıhhat bakımından
sahih-hasen-zayıf-mevzû, müntehası bakımından merfu-mevkûf-maktû’ gibi farklı
şekillerde yer almaktadır.
Çalışmaya başlarken müellifin hayatı, hocaları, öğrencileri, eserleri ve
Meâlimü’t-Tenzîl hakkında kısaca bilgi verildi. Sonrasında Kehf, Meryem, Tâhâ ve
Enbiyâ sûrelerinin tefsirinde rivayet etmiş olduğu doksan sekiz rivayetin geçmiş
olduğu temel eserler belirtilerek bu rivayetler hakkındaki görüşler ortaya konuldu. Bir
rivayet hakkında kanaatimizi belirlerken muhaddis ve muhakkiklerin o rivayet
hakkında zikretmiş oldukları görüşlerden istifade edildi.
Yaptığımız bu çalışmada ulaşılan sonuca göre, eserde Kehf, Meryem, Tâhâ ve
Enbiyâ sûrelerinin tefsirinde yer verilen doksan sekiz rivayetin 57 tanesinin (% 58.16)
isnadlı, 41 tanesinin (% 41.83) isnadsız olduğu; 91 tanesinin (% 92.85) merfû‘ ve 7
tanesinin de (% 7.14) mevkûf olduğu, 79 tanesine (% 80.61) Kütüb-i Tis‘a’da, 13
tanesine (% 13.26) Kütüb-i Tis’a dışındaki hadis kitaplarında ve 6 tanesine (% 6.12)
ise hadis kitapları dışındaki kaynaklarda yer verildiği ve 36 tanesi (% 36.73)
müttefekun aleyh olmak üzere 64 tanesinin (% 65.3) sahîh, 7 tanesinin (% 7.14) hasen,
24 tanesinin (% 24.48) zayıf ve 3 tanesinin de (% 3.06) hakkında hüküm
verilemeyenler kısmına ait olduğu tespit edildi.
The research narrats that the Bagavi wrote while interpreting the chapters of Surah el-Kahf, Maryam, Taha and Anbiyâ in his “Maalim at-tanzil” the famous interpretaion and also has written as in a type of Tafsir were examined. The narrations that we have examined here take the author's work in different forms such as ‘chain’ & without ‘chain’ in terms of the chain, ‘authentic’ – ‘beautiful’ – ‘weak’ – ‘invented’ in terms of ‘truth’, ‘traceable’ – ‘untraceable’ – ‘disconnected’ in terms of ‘termination’. The study kicked off, brief information has been given about the life of the author, his teachers, students, studies and Maalim at-tanzil. Afterwards, the main works in which ninety-eight narrations that he narrated in the commentary of Kahf, Maryam, Taha and Anbiyâ chapters were mentioned, and opinions about these narrations were revealed. While we determine our opinion about a narration, it was benefited from the opinions of the hadiths scholars about that particular narration . The study conclude that 57 of the ninety-eight narrations (58.16%) included in the interpretation of the Kahf, Maryam, Tahâ and Anbiyâ chapters are with chain and 41 (41.83%) are without chain; 91 of them ( 92.85% ) are traceable and 7 of them ( 7.14% ) are untraceable in “Kutub Tis’a” 79 (80.61% ), 13 (13.26%) in other hadith books except “al-Kutub-i al-Tis'a” and 6 of them which were included in the sources except those hadith books ( 6.12% ) and also 36 of them (36.73% ) were ‘Agreed Upon’, 64 of them (65.3 % ) were ‘authentic’ , 7 ( 7.14% ) were ‘beautiful’ , 24 (24.48% ) were ‘weak’ and finaly it was determined that (3.06%) belonged to the part about which no judgment could be given.
The research narrats that the Bagavi wrote while interpreting the chapters of Surah el-Kahf, Maryam, Taha and Anbiyâ in his “Maalim at-tanzil” the famous interpretaion and also has written as in a type of Tafsir were examined. The narrations that we have examined here take the author's work in different forms such as ‘chain’ & without ‘chain’ in terms of the chain, ‘authentic’ – ‘beautiful’ – ‘weak’ – ‘invented’ in terms of ‘truth’, ‘traceable’ – ‘untraceable’ – ‘disconnected’ in terms of ‘termination’. The study kicked off, brief information has been given about the life of the author, his teachers, students, studies and Maalim at-tanzil. Afterwards, the main works in which ninety-eight narrations that he narrated in the commentary of Kahf, Maryam, Taha and Anbiyâ chapters were mentioned, and opinions about these narrations were revealed. While we determine our opinion about a narration, it was benefited from the opinions of the hadiths scholars about that particular narration . The study conclude that 57 of the ninety-eight narrations (58.16%) included in the interpretation of the Kahf, Maryam, Tahâ and Anbiyâ chapters are with chain and 41 (41.83%) are without chain; 91 of them ( 92.85% ) are traceable and 7 of them ( 7.14% ) are untraceable in “Kutub Tis’a” 79 (80.61% ), 13 (13.26%) in other hadith books except “al-Kutub-i al-Tis'a” and 6 of them which were included in the sources except those hadith books ( 6.12% ) and also 36 of them (36.73% ) were ‘Agreed Upon’, 64 of them (65.3 % ) were ‘authentic’ , 7 ( 7.14% ) were ‘beautiful’ , 24 (24.48% ) were ‘weak’ and finaly it was determined that (3.06%) belonged to the part about which no judgment could be given.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Beğavî, Meâlimu’t-Tenzîl, Kehf Sûresi, Meryem Sûresi, Tâhâ Sûresi, Enbiyâ Sûresi, Hadîs, Baghawi, Ma’alim at-Tanzil, Surah al-Kahf, Surah al-Taha, Surah al-Maryam, Surah al-Anbiya, Hadith, Extraction, Tahrîç
Kaynak
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
Künye
Öztürk, F., (2023). Beğavî'nin Meâlimü't-Tenzîl İsimli Tefsirindeki Hadislerin Tahriç ve Değerlendirilmesi (Kehf, Taha, Meryem ve Enbiyâ Sûreleri). (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
