RESPONSE OF GRAPEVINE (Vitis vinifera L.) LEAVES TO DIFFERENT LEAF FERTILIZERS UNDER A SEMI-ARID CONDITION

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDilek, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSabir, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:26:04Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:26:04Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractEver-increasing shortage in global agricultural water sources urged the researchers to investigate sustainable strategies for alleviating the negative effects of drought on plants in semi arid or arid regions. In this sense, foliar fertilization gained particular significance as it supports the plant to cope with water shortage. This study was conducted to investigate the leaf physiological response of the grapevine 'Narince' to various organic leaf fertilizers. Leaf protein content was also determined to compare treatment effects on nutritional value of grape leaves since the leaves of this cultivar are consumed in various ways. Both stomatal conductance, leaf chlorophyll and protein content increased in response to leaf fertilizers in varying degrees according to the products used. To illustrate, Herbagreen pulverization resulted in the highest stomatal conductance (gs) (324.7 mmol H2O m(-2) s(-1)), and was followed by Cropset (323.5 mmol H2O m(-2) si) while the lowest gs value was obtained from control vines (295.4 mmol H2O m(2) s(-1)). The highest chlorophyll and protein contents were obtained from ISR 2000 (32.9 mg kg(-1)) and Maxicrop (21.5%) treatments, respectively. Leaf chlorophyll content had a significant positive correlation with leaf protein content when all the observations were pooled. Therefore, the organic leaf fertilizers can be considered as a safe, sustainable and innovative strategies to support plants to cope with drought.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage155en_US
dc.identifier.issn1644-0692en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage145en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/33949
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000391345700011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWYDAWNICTWO AKAD ROLNICZEJ W LUBLINIEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-HORTORUM CULTUSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectwater shortageen_US
dc.subjectstomatal conductanceen_US
dc.subjectchlorophyll concentrationen_US
dc.subjectleaf temperatureen_US
dc.titleRESPONSE OF GRAPEVINE (Vitis vinifera L.) LEAVES TO DIFFERENT LEAF FERTILIZERS UNDER A SEMI-ARID CONDITIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu