Reconstructive surgery in male infertility: The technique and predictive parameters [Erkek infertilitesinde rekonstrüktif cerrahi: Teknik ve prediktif ölçütler]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTezer H.M.
dc.contributor.authorGüven S.
dc.contributor.authorErsay A.
dc.contributor.authorErol B.
dc.contributor.authorKadio?lu A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:04:58Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of infertile male evaluation is to unveil the etiology of infertility and plan the specific treatment according to the etiology. In case there is not a specific treatment the aim is to refer to assisted reproductive techniques. However the etiology specific treatment of male infertility, compared to the assisted reproductive techniques is more cost effective and it does not have the risks of assisted reproductive techniques. Materials and Methods: The obstruction of the sperm ducts is one of the correctable causes of male infertility and the treatment varies according to the localization of obstruction. When there is distal ejaculatory duct pathology the treatment choice is TUR-ED while in proximal ejaculatory duct patologies reconstructive treatment is the preferred choice (vasovasostomy/epididymovasostomy). Peroperative semen freezing is offered to the patient as there is a risk of recurrence. Results: The reconstructive surgery of ductal system has been improved through years and so has the operation success. The success of the operation is to provide a ductal patency and pregnancy. The milestone of operative technique is the use of the microscope. With the use of the microscope the obstruction is localized more effectively and the anastomoses are made according to the anatomy. Consecuently, the success of the operation is higher. Conclusion: The success rate of the operation, on behalf of the development of the operational technique, depends on the choice of the right patient. In order to predict the success of the operation some parameters were tried to be established in some studies. It was stated that some preoperative and peroperative parameters have predictive importance.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-5804en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage319en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/20809
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Uroloji Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEpididymovasostomyen_US
dc.subjectInfertilityen_US
dc.subjectObstructive azoospermiaen_US
dc.subjectVasovasostomyen_US
dc.titleReconstructive surgery in male infertility: The technique and predictive parameters [Erkek infertilitesinde rekonstrüktif cerrahi: Teknik ve prediktif ölçütler]en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu