COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FLOW REGIMES FOR THE EXAMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Havva
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Selim
dc.contributor.authorBerktay, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:34:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:34:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe management of the water resources is an important issue in the countries around the world because it depends on many variables. Prior to the growing environmental awareness, flow rate and regime are critical components of water supply, water quality, and the ecological integrity of river systems. Environmental flow may be described as the required stream flow quantity to support the ecological activity in a river system. While environmental flow assessment provides protection and use balance over the water resources and it also reduces the natural and artificial effects that caused of deterioration of the natural condition of the rivers. There are only a few environmental flow assessment studies in Turkey. In this paper, daily flow data has been used to determine the flow regimes in order to have some idea about the environmental flow. For this purpose, common methods such as original Tennant method, modified Tennant method, wetted perimeter method, 7Q10 and Q95 have been examined. Daily flow data has been obtained from three gauging stations located in Great Menderes Basin. The first one (07-30) is unregulated, the second is regulated (07-04) and the third one is indirectly regulated (07-71) gauging stations. As a result of this study, particular methods have more reliability and might be more appropriate for each case. The modified Tennant method could be selected as the most practical method for the measured data of flow rates in unregulated gauging station. Q95 method can be used for the other two stations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University Scientific Research Project FundSelcuk University [BAP13101008]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has been supported by Selcuk University Scientific Research Project Fund (BAP13101008).en_US
dc.identifier.endpage510en_US
dc.identifier.issn2224-4980en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid#YOKen_US
dc.identifier.startpage499en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/34894
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000417183100011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHEALTH & ENVIRONMENT ASSOCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental flowen_US
dc.subjectTennant methoden_US
dc.subjectWater resourcesen_US
dc.subjectWetted perimeteren_US
dc.subjectQ95en_US
dc.titleCOMPARATIVE STUDY OF FLOW REGIMES FOR THE EXAMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu