Kast Unsuru ve Cezalandırılabilme Şartı Ekseninde Hakaret Suçu
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2019 Aralık
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Türk Ceza Hukukunda hakaret suçu ile ilgili temel düzenleme TCK m. 125’te karşımıza çıkar. Kanunkoyucu, ilgili maddede hakaret suçunu tanımlarken huzurda ve gıyapta hakaretin aynı şekilde cezalandırılmasını öngörmüştür. Hakaret eyleminin işleniş şekillerinden olan gıyapta hakaret için gereken ihtilat şartının hukuki niteliği tartışmalıdır. İhtilat unsurunun kastın kapsamında görülmesi ile objektif cezalandırma şartı olarak mütalaa edilmesi arasında doğan fark failin cezalandırılabilirliğini doğrudan etkilemektedir. O halde ihtilatın hukuki niteliğinin isabetli şekilde ortaya konulması hukuki bir zorunluluktur. Ayrıca, doktrin ve Yargıtay uygulaması birlikte değerlendirildiğinde, mevcut yasal düzenlemenin yeniden ele alınması gerekliliği ile karşılaşılmaktadır. Bu konuda Alman Ceza Kanunu’nun 186. maddesi aydınlatıcıdır.
In Turkish Criminal Law, the main article about the crime of insult is the Article 125 of Turkish Penal Code. When defining the offense in the related article, the legislator stipulated that the insult in the presence of the victim and the insult in the absence of the victim should be punished in the same way. The legal characteristic of the required condition -which is the act should be committed in the presence of at least three further people- for being culpable for an insult made in the absence of the victim, is controversial. The difference between considering the required condition to be culpable for an insult made in the absence of the victim in the scope of the element of intention and considering it in the scope of objective conditions of punishability is directly affects the punishability of the perpetrator. In this case, it is a legal obligation that the legal characteristic of this required condition to be put forward accurately. Moreover, if the doctrine and the Court of Cassation decisions are evaluated together, this clearly shows that it is necessary to reconsider existing legal regulations. Article 186 of the German Penal Code is enlightening about this issue.
In Turkish Criminal Law, the main article about the crime of insult is the Article 125 of Turkish Penal Code. When defining the offense in the related article, the legislator stipulated that the insult in the presence of the victim and the insult in the absence of the victim should be punished in the same way. The legal characteristic of the required condition -which is the act should be committed in the presence of at least three further people- for being culpable for an insult made in the absence of the victim, is controversial. The difference between considering the required condition to be culpable for an insult made in the absence of the victim in the scope of the element of intention and considering it in the scope of objective conditions of punishability is directly affects the punishability of the perpetrator. In this case, it is a legal obligation that the legal characteristic of this required condition to be put forward accurately. Moreover, if the doctrine and the Court of Cassation decisions are evaluated together, this clearly shows that it is necessary to reconsider existing legal regulations. Article 186 of the German Penal Code is enlightening about this issue.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Hakaret, Gıyapta Hakaret, İhtilat Şartı, Hakaret Suçunda Manevi Unsur, Crime of Insult, The Insult in the Absence of the Victim, The Condition of the Act Should Be Committed in the Presence of at Least Three Further People, The Moral Element of the Crime of Insult, Objective Conditions of Punishability, Objektif Cezalandırılma Şartı
Kaynak
Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
27
Sayı
3
Künye
Tulay, M. E., (2019). Kast Unsuru ve Cezalandırılabilme Şartı Ekseninde Hakaret Suçu. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(3), 573-587.
Doi: 10.15337/suhfd.624336
