Apical microleakage of different root canal sealers after use of maleic acid and EDTA as final irrigants

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Ozgur Ilke
dc.contributor.authorNayir, Yelda
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Kezban
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Sis Darendeliler
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:49:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:49:25Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and maleic acid (MA) on the sealing ability of various root canal sealers. Eighty root canals were instrumented and irrigated with either EDTA or MA. They were divided into eight experimental groups and obturated as follows: Group 1: MA + Hybrid Root SEAL/gutta-percha. Group 2: EDTA + Hybrid Root SEAL/gutta-percha. Group 3: MA + iRoot SP/gutta-percha. Group 4: EDTA + iRoot SP/gutta-percha. Group 5: MA + EndoREZ/EndoREZ points. Group 6: EDTA + EndoREZ/EndoREZ points. Group 7: MA + AH Plus/gutta-percha. Group 8: EDTA + AH Plus/gutta-percha. Another ten roots were used as negative and positive controls. The microleakage of each sample was measured at 2-min intervals for 8 min using the fluid filtration method. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey, and paired-samples t tests. The minimum microleakage values were obtained from the teeth obturated with AH Plus and EndoREZ selaers (p < 0.001). The samples with Hybrid Root SEAL showed the maximum leakage (p < 0.001). There were significant differences between the groups irrigated with MA or EDTA in terms of microleakage (p < 0.05). Use of MA resulted in higher microleakage values compared with those using EDTA. The type of final irrigation solution seems to influence the postobturation apical seal. Use of AH Plus and EndoREZ sealers showed better sealing ability compared with IRoot SP and Hybrid Root SEAL.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0048en_US
dc.identifier.endpage342en_US
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25229787en_US
dc.identifier.startpage337en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0048
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/30605
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348892300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA ODONTOLOGICAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCHen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEdetic Aciden_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectDental Leakageen_US
dc.titleApical microleakage of different root canal sealers after use of maleic acid and EDTA as final irrigantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu