Karma Hükümetten Denetim ve Dengeye Erkler Ayrılığı İlkesi
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2022 Eylül
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Tarih boyunca en iyi yönetimin hangisi olduğu ve nasıl gerçekleştirileceği filozof ve hukukçuları hep meşgul etmiştir. Aristo’dan 17. asra kadar toplumun farklı kesimlerinin iktidara ortak edilmesine odaklanılmış, ılımlılık ve ölçüye dayanan, alt sınıflara iktidardan pay veren karma hükümetlerin en iyi devlet şekli olduğu kabul edilmiştir. 17. asırdan itibaren denge fikrinden uzaklaşılarak, mülkiyet ve özgürlükleri içeren burjuva kapitalist değerlerin korunması temel amaç haline getirilmiştir. Üç işlevin üç ayrı organa verilmesiyle oluşacak özgürlükler alanında kendini gerçekleştiren bireylerin refah ve adaletin kaynağı olacağı beklentisi, erkler ayrılığının kabulündeki asıl saiktir. Geniş halk kitlelerinin gerçekleşmeyen adalet ve refaha ilişkin hayal kırıklıkları modern negatif anayasacılık kurgusunun temellerinin sorgulanması için yeterli bir gerekçedir. Çalışma karma hükümetten farklı olarak erkler ayrılığının tüm kesimlerin değil sermaye sınıfının çıkarları doğrultusunda anayasal bir yapı oluşturduğu fikrine dayanır. TBMM’nin çıkardığı kanunlar da dahil olmak üzere hiçbir işleminin yargı denetimine tabi tutulmaması teklifi de halk adına egemenliği kullanan yasama organıyla diğerleri arasındaki bozulan dengenin yeniden tesisi için önerilmiştir.
Philosophers and lawyers have always been occupied with the best administration and how it will be implemented throughout history. From Aristotle to the 17th century, the focus was on the aim of making different segments of society a partner in power. Mixed governments, based on moderation and temperance, and giving a share of power to the lower classes, were considered the best form of government. Since the 17th century, the idea of balance has been abandoned and the protection of bourgeois capitalist values including property and freedoms has become the main objective. The expectation that individuals who realize themselves in the field of freedoms that will be formed by assigning three functions to three separate organs will be the source of welfare and justice is the main motivation for the acceptance of the separation of powers. The disillusionment of the large mass of people with the unrealized justice and welfare is sufficient justification to call into question the foundations of the modern construct of negative constitutionalism. The study is based on the idea that, unlike the mixed government, the separation of powers creates a constitutional structure in line with the interests of the capitalist class, not all segments. The proposal that none of the acts of the TGNA, including the laws enacted, be subject to judicial review was also brought forward to restore the balance between the legislature that exercises sovereignty on behalf of the people, and the others.
Philosophers and lawyers have always been occupied with the best administration and how it will be implemented throughout history. From Aristotle to the 17th century, the focus was on the aim of making different segments of society a partner in power. Mixed governments, based on moderation and temperance, and giving a share of power to the lower classes, were considered the best form of government. Since the 17th century, the idea of balance has been abandoned and the protection of bourgeois capitalist values including property and freedoms has become the main objective. The expectation that individuals who realize themselves in the field of freedoms that will be formed by assigning three functions to three separate organs will be the source of welfare and justice is the main motivation for the acceptance of the separation of powers. The disillusionment of the large mass of people with the unrealized justice and welfare is sufficient justification to call into question the foundations of the modern construct of negative constitutionalism. The study is based on the idea that, unlike the mixed government, the separation of powers creates a constitutional structure in line with the interests of the capitalist class, not all segments. The proposal that none of the acts of the TGNA, including the laws enacted, be subject to judicial review was also brought forward to restore the balance between the legislature that exercises sovereignty on behalf of the people, and the others.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Karma Hükümet, Erkler Ayrılığı, Denetim ve Denge, Anayasa Yargısı, Egemenlik, Mixed Government, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, Constitutional Justice, Sovereignty
Kaynak
Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
30
Sayı
3
Künye
Delice, A., (2022). Karma Hükümetten Denetim ve Dengeye Erkler Ayrılığı İlkesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 1667-1704.
DOI: 10.15337/suhfd.1095794
