Elektrostimülasyon Egzersizi ve Fitness Yapan Kadınların Vücut Kompozisyonlarının Karşılaştırılması
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2022
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı; Elektrostimülasyon (EMS) egzersizi ve Fitness egzersizi yapan
bireylerin bazı vücut kompozizyonu değerlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Çalışmaya EMS (n=15), Fitness (n=15),Kontrol (n=15) olmak üzere toplamda(n=45)
sedanter kadın katılmıştır. Egzersiz gruplarından EMS ve fitness grubuna 8 hafta egzersiz programı
uygulanmış kontrol grubuna ise herhangi bir uygulama yapılmamıştır. Yapılan ölçümler ön test ve son
test olarak iki kez alınıp, Bio Elektrik Impedans Yöntemine ait olan Tanitabc 418 ile çevre ölçümleri
için 0.1 mm. hassasiyetli şeffaf mezura ile yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde araştırmaya katılan
bireylerin yaş, boy ve kilo bilgileri gruplara göre ortalama ve standart sapmaları verilmiştir. Deney ve
Kontrol grubundaki katılımcılardan elde edilen veriler üzerinde yapılacak olan istatistiksel analizlere
karar vermek için normallik analizlerinden Kolmogorov-Smirnov Testi yapılmıştır. Normal dağılım
standartlarına uymadığı için üç ve daha fazla non-parametrik testler kullanılmıştır. Deney ve kontrol
gruplarının kendi içindeki gelişimlerini belirleyebilmek için erişi değerleri (son test-ilk test) grup
değişkenine göre parametrik olamayan testlerden Kruskall Wallis-h testi ile değerlendirilmiştir.
Araştırmada elde edilen veriler için uygulanacak istatistiksel SPSS paket programı kullanılarak analiz
edilmiştir. İstatistiksel işlemlerde anlamlılık düzeyi p<0.05 olarak alınmıştır.
Sonuç olarak; deney grubunun ön test ve son test değerlerinin analizinde EMS grubunun
fitness ve kontrol grubuna göre gelişim (Erişi (sontest-ilktest)) değerlerinin analizinde vücut ağırlığı,
BKI, , yağ oranı (%), yağ miktarı (kg)su % ve vücut çevre ölçüm parametrelerinde istatiksel olarak
fark bulunmuştur(P<0.05). FFM (vücut yağsız kütle), kas ve kemik parametrelerinde istatiksel olarak
anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır (P>0.05).
The aim of this study was to investigate some body composition values of individuals who performed electrostimulation (EMS) exercise and fitness exercise. A total of (n=45) sedentary women participated in the study, including EMS (n=15), Fitness (n=15), Control (n=15). 8 weeks of exercise program was applied to EMS and fitness group from exercise groups, and no application was made to the control group. The measurements made were taken twice as a preliminary test and final test, and 0.1 mm for environmental measurements with Tanitabc 418, which belongs to the Bio Electric Impedance Method. They are made with a transparent tape measure. In the analysis of the data, the average and standard deviations of the individuals participating in the study according to age, height and weight information groups were given. In order to determine the statistical analyses to be performed on the data obtained from the participants in the Experimental and control groups, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was performed, which is one of the normality analyses. Three or more non-parametric tests were used because they did not meet the normal distribution standards. In order to determine the development of the experimental and control groups within themselves, access values (final test-first test) were evaluated using the Kruskall Wallis-h test, which is one of the tests that cannot be parametric according to the group variable. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the statistical SPSS package program to be applied for the data. The significance level was taken as p<0.05 in statistical procedures. As a result, in the analysis of the pre-test and post-test values of the experimental group, a statistical difference was found in the body weight, BMI, , fat ratio (%), amount of fat (kg), % of water and body environmental measurement parameters in the analysis of the development (Access (post-test)) values of the EMS group compared to the fitness and control group(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in FFM (body fat-free mass), November and bone parameters (P>0.05).
The aim of this study was to investigate some body composition values of individuals who performed electrostimulation (EMS) exercise and fitness exercise. A total of (n=45) sedentary women participated in the study, including EMS (n=15), Fitness (n=15), Control (n=15). 8 weeks of exercise program was applied to EMS and fitness group from exercise groups, and no application was made to the control group. The measurements made were taken twice as a preliminary test and final test, and 0.1 mm for environmental measurements with Tanitabc 418, which belongs to the Bio Electric Impedance Method. They are made with a transparent tape measure. In the analysis of the data, the average and standard deviations of the individuals participating in the study according to age, height and weight information groups were given. In order to determine the statistical analyses to be performed on the data obtained from the participants in the Experimental and control groups, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was performed, which is one of the normality analyses. Three or more non-parametric tests were used because they did not meet the normal distribution standards. In order to determine the development of the experimental and control groups within themselves, access values (final test-first test) were evaluated using the Kruskall Wallis-h test, which is one of the tests that cannot be parametric according to the group variable. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the statistical SPSS package program to be applied for the data. The significance level was taken as p<0.05 in statistical procedures. As a result, in the analysis of the pre-test and post-test values of the experimental group, a statistical difference was found in the body weight, BMI, , fat ratio (%), amount of fat (kg), % of water and body environmental measurement parameters in the analysis of the development (Access (post-test)) values of the EMS group compared to the fitness and control group(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in FFM (body fat-free mass), November and bone parameters (P>0.05).
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Electrostimulation (EMS), FitnessTraining, Vücut Kompozisyonu, Fitness Training, Body Composition
Kaynak
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
Künye
Erdemir, D., (2022). Elektrostimülasyon Egzersizi ve Fitness Yapan Kadınların Vücut Kompozisyonlarının Karşılaştırılması. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
