Fluid flow evaluation of coronal microleakage intraorifice barrier materials in endodontically treated teeth

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBayram H.M.
dc.contributor.authorÇelikten B.
dc.contributor.authorBayram E.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:48:14Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:48:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was to compare the coronal microleakage intraorifice barrier materials, called CoroSeal (CS), fissur sealant (FS), flowable composite FC, and policarboksilate cement (PC), by using the computerized fluid filtration method. Materials and Methods: Fifty freshly extracted, single-canal human maxillary central teeth were used in this study. The teeth were decoronated to a standardized root length of 15 mm. After preparation and irrigation, all the teeth were obturated with gutta-percha and AH-Plus. In all teeth, the coronal 2 mm of root filling was removed and replaced with one of the intraorifice barriers. According to intraorifice barriers, teeth were divided randomly into 4 experimental groups (n = 10) and 2 control groups (n = 5). Group 1: CS; Group 2: FS; Group 3: FC; and Group 4: PC. Positive Control Group: No barrier material was used. Negative Control Group: Roots were completely coated with the nail polish, including the orifice. Leakage was evaluated by using a computerized fluid filtration model. Differences in fluid filtration among groups were subjected to statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis Test and multiple comparisons test. Results: A value of P < 0.05 was statistically significant. Statistical analysis has indicated that the CS leaked significantly less than other groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference between FS and PC (P < 0.05), in contrast there was no significant difference between FS and FC (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Using the CS material as an intraorrifice barrier material reduced amount of microleakage as compared with FS, FC, and PC. © 2013 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.115421en_US
dc.identifier.endpage362en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage359en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.115421
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/30151
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectBarrier materialsen_US
dc.subjectCoroSealen_US
dc.subjectFluid filtrationen_US
dc.subjectLeakageen_US
dc.titleFluid flow evaluation of coronal microleakage intraorifice barrier materials in endodontically treated teethen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu