Bacterial penetration of restored cavities using two self-etching bonding systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCobanoglu Dr. N.
dc.contributor.authorOzer F.
dc.contributor.authorDemirci M.
dc.contributor.authorErganis O.
dc.contributor.authorImazato S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:59:00Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two bonding systems, with and without antibacterial monomers, on marginal bacterial and dye leakage. Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared in extracted teeth for a bacterial leakage test, and the teeth were sterilized using a steam autoclave. Four cavities were not restored for the controls, and the other teeth were divided into two groups (n = 16 cavities each): Clearfil Protect Bond group (CPB) and Clearfil SE Bond group (CSE). After application of the bonding agent, the cavities were restored using a composite resin (Clearfil AP-X). The teeth were thermocycled, stored in a broth culture of 1.56 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/ml of Streptococcus mutans at 37°C for 10 days, and subsequently processed for bacterial staining. Sections from the demineralized teeth were evaluated under a light microscope. In the dye leakage test, the cavities were restored as described in the bacterial penetration test. After thermocycling, the teeth were immersed in 5% basic fuchsin for 24 h, and then divided in half and observed under a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests (P = 0.05). Results: The bacterial stain was detected at the cavity wall of five cavities in both bonding systems. Additionally, two cavities in the CSE group, one cavity in the CPB group, and all control cavities showed bacterial staining within the cut dentinal tubules. Dye staining at the axial cavity wall was detected in only three of the teeth for both bonding systems. Conclusion: The bonding systems used in this study provided an acceptable marginal seal to prevent bacterial and dye leakage. © 2014 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.130590en_US
dc.identifier.endpage171en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage166en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.130590
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/31375
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDental Investigations Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectBacterial microleakageen_US
dc.subjectDye leakageen_US
dc.subjectSelf-etch adhesiveen_US
dc.titleBacterial penetration of restored cavities using two self-etching bonding systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu