Vücutta farklı lokalizasyonlardaki apse odaklarının trokar tip kateterle tek basamakta tedavisi: İki yıllık deneyim sonuçları
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2011
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı görüntüleme eşliğinde perkütan apse drenajı için trokar tip kateterin kullanımını pratikliğini ve ekonomik olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Haziran 2008-Aralık 2010 tarihleri arasında farklı organ veya sistemlerde yerleşimli apsesi olan toplam 48 olgu, perkütan apse drenajı işlemi için girişimsel radyoloji ünitesine yönlendirildi. Hastaların tümünde yaş, apsenin yerleştiği organ veya vücut bölümü ve apse boyutu kaydedildi. Kırkiki (%87) olguda ultrasomografi eşliğinde, 6 (%13) olguda bilgisayarlı tomografi eşliğinde işlem yapılmış olup bir pediatrik hastada işlem sedasyon anestezisi (remifentanil, midazolam) diğer tüm hastalarda lokal anestezi (prilokain hidroklorür) uygulandıktan sonra gerçekleştirildi. Apse drenajının sağlandığı kateterizasyon işlemi, teknik olarak başarılı kabul edildi. Bulgular: Kırk sekiz hastada (25 erkek, 23 kadın; yaş ortalaması 52 yıl, yaş aralığı 2-82 yıl) farklı organ veya sistemlerde yerleşimli apselere trokar tip kateterle görüntüleme eşliğinde perkütan apse drenajı işlemi uygulandı. Teknik başarı tüm olgularda (%100) sağlandı. Hiçbir olguda işlem sırasında komplikasyon olmadı. Perkütan drenaj sonrası kateterlerin çıkartılma süresi 5-28 gün (ortalama 11.2 gün) idi. Splenektomi lojundaki apsesi başarılı bir şekilde drene edilen bir olgu dışında nüks apse saptanmadı. Sonuç: Vücudun farklı lokalizasyonlarında yerleşimli apselerin tedavisinde kolay uygulanabilir, tedavi maliyeti ucuz, komplikasyon riski az bir yöntem olan trokar tip kateterle görüntüleme eşliğinde perkütan apse drenajı öncelikli tercih olmalıdır.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to emphasize the feasibility and cost effectiveness of trocar type catheter in percutaneous abscess drainage under imaging guidance and to determine the clinical efficacy of the method. Materials and methods: From June 2008 to December 2010, 48 patients who were referred to interventional radiology unit, in order to undergo percutaneous abscess drainage. All was data including age, the organ or the part of the body where the abscess was localized and size of abscess were recorded. Forty-two (87%) patients underwent drainage with ultrasonographic guidance, while 6 (13%) underwent with computed tomography guidance. One pediatric patient underwent systemic sedation anesthesia (with remiphentanyl and midazolam) and the rest of the patient with local anesthesia (with prilocain hydrochlorid). Catheterization procedure with which abscess drainage was done accepted as technically successful. Results: Imaging guided percutaneous abscess drainage procedures were performed with trocar type catheter to localized abscesses in different organs or systems in 48 patients (25 men, 23 women, mean age 52 years, range 2-82 years). Technical success was 100% in all cases. No patient had a complication during the procedure. Time to extraction of percutaneous catheter after drainage procedure was 5-28 days (mean 11.2 days). There was no recurrence except for a case, in which an abscess at the splenectomy site was successfully drained. Conclusion: Percutaneous drainage with imaging guidance using the trocar type catheter should be preferred because of its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and reduced rate of complications in treating abscesses, which localized at different organ systems.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to emphasize the feasibility and cost effectiveness of trocar type catheter in percutaneous abscess drainage under imaging guidance and to determine the clinical efficacy of the method. Materials and methods: From June 2008 to December 2010, 48 patients who were referred to interventional radiology unit, in order to undergo percutaneous abscess drainage. All was data including age, the organ or the part of the body where the abscess was localized and size of abscess were recorded. Forty-two (87%) patients underwent drainage with ultrasonographic guidance, while 6 (13%) underwent with computed tomography guidance. One pediatric patient underwent systemic sedation anesthesia (with remiphentanyl and midazolam) and the rest of the patient with local anesthesia (with prilocain hydrochlorid). Catheterization procedure with which abscess drainage was done accepted as technically successful. Results: Imaging guided percutaneous abscess drainage procedures were performed with trocar type catheter to localized abscesses in different organs or systems in 48 patients (25 men, 23 women, mean age 52 years, range 2-82 years). Technical success was 100% in all cases. No patient had a complication during the procedure. Time to extraction of percutaneous catheter after drainage procedure was 5-28 days (mean 11.2 days). There was no recurrence except for a case, in which an abscess at the splenectomy site was successfully drained. Conclusion: Percutaneous drainage with imaging guidance using the trocar type catheter should be preferred because of its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and reduced rate of complications in treating abscesses, which localized at different organ systems.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Cerrahi
Kaynak
Dicle Tıp Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
38
Sayı
4
