Closure Versus Nonclosure of Peritoneum at Cesarean Section: Evaluation of Postoperative Pain

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Sema
dc.contributor.authorÇapar, Metin
dc.contributor.authorYosunkaya, Alper
dc.contributor.authorTavlan, Aybars
dc.contributor.authorOtelcioğlu, Şeref
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:45:30Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:45:30Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOur purpose was to evaluate postoperative opioid requirements in the closure or nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Eighty patients who were to undergo cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to two groups. The operative technique was randomized to include either nonclosure of both visceral and parietal peritoneum (study group) or closure of both layers (control group). Operating time and duration of general anesthesia was recorded. The pain was evaluated at rest in the first 12, 24 and 36 h after operation. The amount of morphine used was recorded at the same hours. The mean operating and anesthesia time were significantly longer in the control group than in the study group. Visual analogue scale (VAS) showed no difference in postoperative pain comparing closure to nonclosure of the peritoneum but patients of the control group required significantly more postoperative opioids. In conclusion, nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum reduces operating time and postoperative opioid medication.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTuncer, S., Çapar, M., Yosunkaya, A., Tavlan, A., Otelcioğlu, Ş., (2003). Closure Versus Nonclosure of Peritoneum at Cesarean Section: Evaluation of Postoperative Pain. Pain Clinic, 15(1), 29-33. Doi: 10.1163/156856903321196465
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/156856903321196465en_US
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-1112en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage29en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856903321196465
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/18394
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000182122900005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorTuncer, Sema
dc.institutionauthorÇapar, Metin
dc.institutionauthorYosunkaya, Alper
dc.institutionauthorTavlan, Aybars
dc.institutionauthorOtelcioğlu, Şeref
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVSP Bven_US
dc.relation.ispartofPain Clinicen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectClosure of Peritoneumen_US
dc.subjectNonclosure of Peritoneumen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Painen_US
dc.subjectCesarean Sectionen_US
dc.titleClosure Versus Nonclosure of Peritoneum at Cesarean Section: Evaluation of Postoperative Painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
tuncer2003 (2).pdf
Boyut:
236.09 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon/Makale Koleksiyonu
Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum/Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu