Comparison of intranasal midazolam and midazolam-sufentanil for premedication in children [Çocuklarm premedikasyonunda i?ntranazal midazolam ve midazolam-sufentanilin karşilaştirilmasi]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTopal A.
dc.contributor.authorErol A.
dc.contributor.authorTavlan A.
dc.contributor.authorKiliçaslan A.
dc.contributor.authorYalçm N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:28:32Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:28:32Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: We aimed to compare the effect of midazolam and the combination of low dose of midazolam and sufentanil applied intranasal on sedation, hemodynamic parameters and recovery in children for premedication. Materials and Methods: 50 children scheduled for elective tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy were randomized into two groups: Group M (n=25): received midazolam 0.2 mg kg -1, Group M/S (n=25): received 0.1 mg kg-1 midazolam plus 0.75 ?g kg-1 sufentanil intranasal 20 minutes before anesthesia induction. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and Ramsey sedation scores were recorded before and after premedication. The moods of children at the time of separation from parents are recorded as silence or not. The response to venous canulation was assessed operation desk. Anesthesia induction was provided with % 8 sevoflurane in 50 % O2-50 % N 2O and 10 ?g kg-1 alfentanil. The response to face mask was evaluated as accept/deny. Anesthesia was maintained with % 2-3 sevoflurane in 50 % O2-50 % N2O mixture. Postoperative agitation and pain level were determined with Davis Score and POPS respectively. Results: There were no difference in hemodynamic parameters between the groups (p>0.05). Children's mood at the time of seperating from parents, response to face mask, POPS and Davis scores at postoperative 30th minute in Group M, response to venous canulation in Group M/S were significally better (p<0.05). There were no significant difference with respect to Davis and POPS scores measured at postoperative 10th minutes (p>0.05). Conclusions: Midazolam-sufentanil combination used in this study was not found to be a good alternative to midazolam only.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage282en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0871en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage277en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22797
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectIntranasalen_US
dc.subjectMidazolamen_US
dc.subjectPremedicationen_US
dc.subjectSufentanilen_US
dc.titleComparison of intranasal midazolam and midazolam-sufentanil for premedication in children [Çocuklarm premedikasyonunda i?ntranazal midazolam ve midazolam-sufentanilin karşilaştirilmasi]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu