Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic and metal alloy

dc.contributor.authorYucel, Munir Tolga
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorOkutan, Yener
dc.contributor.authorTobi, Elif Sumeyye
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Hamdi Sukur
dc.contributor.authorKepceoglu, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Mustafa Borga
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:53:31Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:53:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe bonding of resin cement to ceramic materials plays an important role in dentistry. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia ceramic and metal alloy. A total of 60 specimens were prepared from Y-TZP ceramic and metal alloy. The specimens were divided into three subgroups (n=10) that received different surface treatments for each material. An Er:YAG laser (ER), a femtosecond laser (FS), and air-borne particle abrasion (A) were employed as surface treatments. One specimen from each group was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 500 x magnification after surface treatments. The self-adhesive resin cement was then bonded to the treated surfaces using a Teflon mold. The specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles at 5-55 degrees C, and then the SBS test was performed. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine the differences between the groups (p=0.05), and failure modes were evaluated for each specimen. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the surface treatment methods. The mean SBS values of the air-borne particle-abraded groups were higher than those of the other groups. The femtosecond-irradiated groups of each material showed significantly higher SBS values than the Er:YAG-irradiated groups (p<0.05). Within the limitations of this study, air-borne particle abrasion and the femtosecond laser were more effective than Er:YAG laser treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2018.1470363en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2243en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616en_US
dc.identifier.issue20en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2232en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1470363
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/36524
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000445077400004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectfemtosecond laseren_US
dc.subjectshear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectsurface treatmenten_US
dc.subjectzirconiaen_US
dc.titleEffect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic and metal alloyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar