The effect of different restoration techniques on fracture strength of teeth with flared roots

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Keziban
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:07:23Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:07:23Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture strength of roots with flared canals. The crowns of 50 extracted single-rooted human teeth were removed and the canals were flared. Five groups were created (n=10): Group 1: ReforPost (Angelus) was luted using Clearfil SA Cement (Kuraray); Group 2: ReforPost and two accessory posts (Reforpin, Angelus) were luted with Clearfil SA Cement; Group 3: Restored with i-TFC post-core system (Sun Medical); Group 4: The thickness of the root-dentine was increased using composite resin (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) and cured with the help of Luminex. ReforPost was then luted; Group 5: Anatomic posts were created by relining ReforPost with Clearfil AP-X and then luted using Clearfil SA Cement. The cores were created with composite resin in all the samples. The crowns of sound teeth were prepared similar to a core (control, n=10). The specimens were vertically loaded (1mm/min), the force that was required to fracture each sample was recorded (N) and analyzed (One Way Anova, Tukey tests). No significant difference was found among the groups (p>0.05). The roots restored by using accessory post and i-TFC post-core (Groups 2 and 3) indicated a 100% favorable fracture pattern. Ten percent of the root fractures were observed in other groups. All techniques saved the root structure and showed 80-100% favorable failure pattern. The use of i-TFC system in flared roots could be an alternative to anatomic, accessory, and prefabricated fiber posts.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2014.970834en_US
dc.identifier.endpage23en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage12en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2014.970834
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32625
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000344397300002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectfracture resistanceen_US
dc.subjectreinforcementen_US
dc.subjectthin-walled rootsen_US
dc.subjectglass fiber posten_US
dc.subjectanatomic posten_US
dc.subjectpost and core techniqueen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different restoration techniques on fracture strength of teeth with flared rootsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu