Kira Konusu Taşınmazın İhtiyaç Nedeniyle Tahliye Ettirilmesi
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2007 Aralık
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Selçuk Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Kira sözleşmesi esas itibariyle Borçlar Kanunu m. 248–298 arasında düzenlenmiştir. Borçlar Kanununun 248–269. maddeleri adi kiraya, 270– 295.maddeleri hasılat kirasına ilişkindir. Ayrıca bazı taşınmaz kiraları için de 6570 sayılı Kanun uygulanır. Kira sözleşmesi çeşitli nedenlerle sona erebilir. Bu çalışmada, 6570 sayılı Kanunun öngördüğü sona erme sebeplerinden biri olan, kiralayanın ihtiyaç iddiasında bulunarak kira konusu taşınmazı tahliye ettirmesi ele alınmıştır. İhtiyaç nedeni ile tahliye, 6570 sayılı Kanunun 7. maddesinin b, c ve d bentlerinde düzenlenmiştir. "Kira sözleşmesi kurulurken malik olunan bir taşınmazın tahliye ettirilmesi" ve "mülkiyeti daha sonra kazanılan bir taşınmazın tahliye ettirilmesi" şeklinde ikili bir ayrım yapılmıştır. İlk ihtimalde; kiralayanın, taşınmazı kendisi veya eşi veya çocukları için mesken olarak kullanma ihtiyacında kalırsa kira akdinin sonunda tahliye davası açabileceği kabul edilir. Ancak ihtiyaç iddiasının gerçek olması gerekir. Kiralayan, sadece "mesken" ihtiyacından değil, yine kendisinin veya eşinin veya çocuklarının bir meslek veya sanatı icra etmesi içinde taşınmazın tahliyesini isteyebilir. Mülkiyeti daha sonra kazanılan bir taşınmazın tahliye ettirilmesi hususunda anlatılmak istenen, başkası tarafından kiralanmış bir taşınmazın mülkiyetini kazanan üçüncü kişinin, ihtiyaç iddiasında bulunarak tahliye isteminde bulunabileceğidir. 2005 tarihli Borçlar Kanunu Tasarısının 357. maddesi ihtiyaç nedeniyle tahliye isteyebilecek olanların sayısını bu ihtimalde genişletmiştir. Yani kişinin kendisi, eşi, altsoyu ve kanun gereği bakmakla yükümlü olduğu kişiler ihtiyaç nedeniyle dava açabileceklerdir. 6570 sayılı Kanun m.7/1, b ve c ye dayandırılacak bir tahliye davası kira süresinin bitiminde açılabilir. Belirsiz süreli kira sözleşmesinde ise fesih sürelerine uymak gerekir. Yeni malik ise m.7/I.d hükmüne dayanarak taşınmazı tahliye ettirmek istiyorsa mülkiyeti kazandığı tarihten itibaren bir ay içinde ihtarname göndermek ve yine kazanma tarihinden itibaren hesaplanacak altı aydan sonrada dava açmak zorundadır.
“Lease agreement” has been essentially mentioned between the 248th and 298th articles of Turkish Code of Obligations. The 248-269 articles of the code are related to ordinary leasing, while the 270-295 ones are about lease of revenue. Besides, Law No.6570 has legality for certain real estate leasing. The lease agreement may end by several reasons. In this study, surrender of leasehold estate by reason of leasers? self need is mentioned that has been predicted as an ending reason of leasing by the Law no.6570. Surrender of leasehold estate by reason of leasers? need has been mentioned in the b, c and sub clauses by 7th articles of the Law No.6570. There is a dual difference (dilemma) between two choices as “surrendering of the leasehold estate that owned afterwards (while the agreement continuing)”. In the first case, if the leaser need to use this real estate as a home for self, for marital partner (wife/husband) or children, it has been accepted that he/she can sue for eviction on expiration of the lease. But the state of need must be actually existed. As well as, not only for home need, the leaser may also want eviction by reason of business place of a profession for self, for martial partner (wife/husband) or children. In the case of surrendering of the leasehold estate that owned afterwards, the implied fact is that; when the ownership of the real estate change hands afterwards first owners? leasing it to someone, then the new owner has the benefit of suing for eviction by reason of need. In this case, by the 357th clause in the bill of parliament of “The Code Of Obligations” dated 2005, the number of authorized people who can sue for eviction, is enlarged. The new owner him/herself, marital partner (wife/husband), descendants and near relatives those he/she is statutorily obliged for taking care of, can sue for eviction. A discharge case which is based on the Law No.6570?s 7/I, b and c sub clauses can be sued at the end of the lease period. And ollas dismissal notices of cancellation must be obeyed as regards as general tenancies. If the new owner wants to make eviction according to 7/I.d sub clauses, he/she must send a warning letter as from getting ownership date and must sue after 6 months likewise as from getting ownership date.
“Lease agreement” has been essentially mentioned between the 248th and 298th articles of Turkish Code of Obligations. The 248-269 articles of the code are related to ordinary leasing, while the 270-295 ones are about lease of revenue. Besides, Law No.6570 has legality for certain real estate leasing. The lease agreement may end by several reasons. In this study, surrender of leasehold estate by reason of leasers? self need is mentioned that has been predicted as an ending reason of leasing by the Law no.6570. Surrender of leasehold estate by reason of leasers? need has been mentioned in the b, c and sub clauses by 7th articles of the Law No.6570. There is a dual difference (dilemma) between two choices as “surrendering of the leasehold estate that owned afterwards (while the agreement continuing)”. In the first case, if the leaser need to use this real estate as a home for self, for marital partner (wife/husband) or children, it has been accepted that he/she can sue for eviction on expiration of the lease. But the state of need must be actually existed. As well as, not only for home need, the leaser may also want eviction by reason of business place of a profession for self, for martial partner (wife/husband) or children. In the case of surrendering of the leasehold estate that owned afterwards, the implied fact is that; when the ownership of the real estate change hands afterwards first owners? leasing it to someone, then the new owner has the benefit of suing for eviction by reason of need. In this case, by the 357th clause in the bill of parliament of “The Code Of Obligations” dated 2005, the number of authorized people who can sue for eviction, is enlarged. The new owner him/herself, marital partner (wife/husband), descendants and near relatives those he/she is statutorily obliged for taking care of, can sue for eviction. A discharge case which is based on the Law No.6570?s 7/I, b and c sub clauses can be sued at the end of the lease period. And ollas dismissal notices of cancellation must be obeyed as regards as general tenancies. If the new owner wants to make eviction according to 7/I.d sub clauses, he/she must send a warning letter as from getting ownership date and must sue after 6 months likewise as from getting ownership date.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
kira sözleşmesi, tahliye, ihtiyaç, mesken ihtiyacı, işyeri ihtiyacı, lease agreement, evacuation, need, home need, business place need
Kaynak
Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
15
Sayı
2
Künye
Ayan, N., (2007). Kira Konusu Taşınmazın İhtiyaç Nedeniyle Tahliye Ettirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 11-24.
