Oküler ve Periorbital Antropometrik Ölçümlerin Değerlendirilmesi
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2004
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Genç ve yetişkin olgularda oküler ve periorbital antropometrik ölçümlerin değerlendirilmesi. Yöntem: Çalışmaya alınan olgular 2 farklı yaş grubuna ayrıldı, birinci grup (genç olgular) yaşları 18 ile 21 (19.73±1.6) arasın- da tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinden, ikinci grup (yetişkin olgular) yaşları 42 ile 65 (52.48±9.2) arasında göz polikliğine muayaneye gelen 150 hastadan oluşturuldu. Travma yada konjenital anomali hikayesi olan olgular çalışma kapsa- mına alınmadı. Tüm olgularda iç kantuslararası mesafe (IKM), dış kantuslararası mesafe (DKM), interpupiller me- safe (IPM), interpalpebral fissür yüksekliği (PFY), interpalpebral fissür uzunluğu (PFU) ölçüldü. Ölçümler aynı ki- şi tarafından elektronik kumpas kullanılarak yapıldı. Elde edilen değerler her iki grupta cinsler arasında karşılaş- tırıldı, ayrıca genç ve yetişkin olgularda aynı cinsler arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ölçümlerin değerlendirilme- sinde İKM, DKM, IPM açısından aynı grupta cinsler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark var iken (p<0.05), iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yok idi (p>0.0), PFM değerleri açısından aynı gruptaki cinsler arasın- da istatistiksel fark var iken (P<0.05), iki grup arasında fark yok idi (p>0.05), PFY açısından birinci grupta cinsler arasında istatistiksel fark var iken (p<0.05), ikinci grupta cinsler arasında istatiksel olarak fark bulunmadı (p>0.05), Sonuç: Gerek bu çalışma ve gerekse diğer çalışmalar oküler ve periorbital antropometrik standartların belirlenme- si için değişik yaş ve etnik grupları içeren geniş kapsamlı çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulduğunu göstermektedir. Sağlık- lı bireylerdeki bu ölçümler bazı morfolojik bozuklukların erken teşhisinde ve cerrahinin planlanmasında faydalı bir rehber olabilir.
Purpose: To evaluate the ocular and periorbital anthropometric measurments in young adults and adults. Met- hods: Our study were enrolled two different age groups, first group (young adults) was consisted of 200 medi- cal students aged between 18 to 21 (19.73±1.6) years, and second group (adults) consisted of 150 patients aged between 42 to 65 (52.48±9.2) years who were examined in department of opthalmology. Cases with history of tra- uma and congenital anomaly were excluded from the study. In all cases the intercanthal distance (ICD), the ou tercanthal distance (OCD), the interpupillary distance (IPD), the palpebral fissure height (PFH) and the palpebral fissure distance (PFD) were measured. Measurments were performed by the same examiner using a single elec- tronic compass instrument. In both groups the measurments between males and females as well as the measur- ments of the same gender between the both groups were compared. Results: In the evaluation of the measur- ments, in ICD, OCD and IPD there was statistically significant differencess between the genders (ie male/fema- le) in same group (p<0.05), while there was no statistically significant differencess between the two groups (p>0.05), in PFD there was no statistically significant differencess between the gender in the same group, while there was statistically significant differencess in between the two groups (p<0.05), and in PFH there was statisti- cally significant differencess between the genders in the first group (p<0.05), however there was no such differen- cess in the second group (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our results on one hand and the contrary results of other stud- ies on the other hand, arise the need for further studies including different ages and ethnics groups to set stan- darts for ocular and periorbital anthropometric measurments. These measurments in healthy subjects may be use- ful guide for early identification of some dysmorphological abnormalities and of planning surgical intervention.
Purpose: To evaluate the ocular and periorbital anthropometric measurments in young adults and adults. Met- hods: Our study were enrolled two different age groups, first group (young adults) was consisted of 200 medi- cal students aged between 18 to 21 (19.73±1.6) years, and second group (adults) consisted of 150 patients aged between 42 to 65 (52.48±9.2) years who were examined in department of opthalmology. Cases with history of tra- uma and congenital anomaly were excluded from the study. In all cases the intercanthal distance (ICD), the ou tercanthal distance (OCD), the interpupillary distance (IPD), the palpebral fissure height (PFH) and the palpebral fissure distance (PFD) were measured. Measurments were performed by the same examiner using a single elec- tronic compass instrument. In both groups the measurments between males and females as well as the measur- ments of the same gender between the both groups were compared. Results: In the evaluation of the measur- ments, in ICD, OCD and IPD there was statistically significant differencess between the genders (ie male/fema- le) in same group (p<0.05), while there was no statistically significant differencess between the two groups (p>0.05), in PFD there was no statistically significant differencess between the gender in the same group, while there was statistically significant differencess in between the two groups (p<0.05), and in PFH there was statisti- cally significant differencess between the genders in the first group (p<0.05), however there was no such differen- cess in the second group (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our results on one hand and the contrary results of other stud- ies on the other hand, arise the need for further studies including different ages and ethnics groups to set stan- darts for ocular and periorbital anthropometric measurments. These measurments in healthy subjects may be use- ful guide for early identification of some dysmorphological abnormalities and of planning surgical intervention.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
İç kantuslararası mesafe, dış kantuslararası mesafe, interpupiller mesafe, interpalpebral fis- sür yüksekliği, interpalpebral fissür uzunluğu, Intercanthal distance, outercanthal distance, the interpupillary distance, the palpebral fissure height, palpebral fissure distance
Kaynak
MN Oftalmoloji
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
20
Sayı
Künye
Kamış, Ü., Çiçekçibaşı, A. E., Tuncer, I., Büyükmumcu, M., Özkağnıcı, A., (2000). Oküler ve Periorbital Antropometrik Ölçümlerin Değerlendirilmesi. MN Oftalmoloji, (20), 29-32.
