Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of Acroseal sealer in comparison with Apexit and Sealapex sealers
dc.contributor.author | Eldeniz, Ayce Unverdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Erdemir, Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Kurtoglu, Firuze | |
dc.contributor.author | Esener, Timur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T17:17:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T17:17:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. This is an in vitro assessment of pH level and calcium ion release exhibited by 3 calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers-Sealapex, Apexit, and Acroseal. Study design. The materials were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions and placed in 1 cm long and 4 mm diameter tubes. The tubes were then immersed in a glass flask containing 10 mL bidistilled water (n = 15), which was sealed and stored at 37 degrees C before the materials had set. The control group contained bidistilled water with empty tubes (n = 12). At predetermined time intervals (24 h, 96 h, and 7, 15, and 28 days) the pH of the bidistilled water was tested with a pH meter and for released calcium by using spectrophotometry. The data were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance for the comparison of the materials at each time point. If the difference was significant, individual comparisons were performed by Tukey multiple comparisons test (alpha = .05). Results. Sealapex produced higher pH and released significantly higher calcium amounts than the other 2 sealers at all periods (P < .05). Apexit showed higher calcium release than Acroseal at the end of 15 days (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the pH between Apexit and Acroseal (P > .05). Conclusion. The new Acroseal sealer presented the least calcium ion release and pH than Sealapex and less calcium ion release than Apexit sealer. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.018 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | E91 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1079-2104 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1528-395X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | E85 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/21392 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 103 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000245441700045 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MOSBY-ELSEVIER | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of Acroseal sealer in comparison with Apexit and Sealapex sealers | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |