Screening for root and shoot traits in different wheat species and wild wheat relatives

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Hayati
dc.contributor.authorAkgün, Necdet
dc.contributor.authorTamkoç, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:42:33Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:42:33Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Definitive comparison on root traits of wheat landraces, ancient wheats and wild wheat relatives are scarce. Those adaptive genetic resources with superior root and shoot traits can be utilized in breeding programs. Questions: Do modern wheats have more superior root and shoot traits than ancient wheat species and wild wheat relatives? Studied species: We performed large-scale screening for significant root and shoot traits of 47 different genotypes including cultivars, lines, landraces, ancient wheat species and wild wheat relatives belonging to 14 different species. Study site and years: was carried out in Central Anatolian Conditions of Turkey from October, 2013 to July, 2014. Methods: This study was conducted at 200 cm long tube under field weather conditions where plants can translate superior performance. Results: A wide range of variations in terms of root and shoot traits were observed among the screened wheat cultivars, lines, landraces, ancient wheat species and wild wheat relatives. The grain yield per plant and root length per plant varied from 2.11 to 12.30 g and 134.7 to 250.7 cm in the cultivars, lines and landraces, respectively, while they ranged from 0.23 to 6.49 g and 170.0 to 240 cm in the ancient wheat species and wild wheat relatives. Conclusions: The superior genotypes that had longer root system and high grain yield can be considered in breeding programs to improve high yielding genotypes and deep-rooted system.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University Scientific Research ProjectsSelcuk University [13401004]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Selcuk University Scientific Research Projects Coordinator for the financial support of this study under the grant No 13401004. The data presented in this article was generated in the purview of the afore-mentioned project; however, the authors of this article are only responsible for the results and discussions made here in. Authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Ali Topal to provide TR 053 '1', TR 062 wheat lines and landraces, Prof. Dr. Phil Bruckner for Montana cultivars and USDA-ARS for genotypes from abroad.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17129/botsci.747en_US
dc.identifier.issn2007-4298en_US
dc.identifier.issn2007-4476en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.17129/botsci.747
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/35456
dc.identifier.volume95en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000396684200011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSOC BOTANICA MEXICOen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBOTANICAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectModern and ancient wheatsen_US
dc.subjectwild wheat relativesen_US
dc.subjectroot and shoot traitsen_US
dc.subjectscreeningen_US
dc.titleScreening for root and shoot traits in different wheat species and wild wheat relativesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu