The effect of infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus on the fertility of cows and heifers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKale, M.
dc.contributor.authorAta, A.
dc.contributor.authorYavru, S.
dc.contributor.authorYapkic, O.
dc.contributor.authorBulut, O.
dc.contributor.authorGulay, M. S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:04:32Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn the current study, blood samples from 319 cows and heifers were studied. Antibodies against BVDV infections in serum samples and BVDV antigens in leukocytes were present in 203 (148 cows and 55 heifers) and 56 (28 cows and 28 heifers) samples, respectively. Although no significant difference was detected between seropositive [BVDV (Ag-/Ab+)] and uninfected [BVDV (Ag-/Ab-)] cows and heifers at the time of the first insemination (FIT), first service age (FSA) or conception rate (CR) (p > 0.05), the difference in age of seropositive and infection free cows differed significantly (p < 0.05). Furthermore, differences in FIT, FSA or age of seropositive and uninfected pregnant cows and heifers did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Differences between persistently infected [BVDV (Ag +/Ab -)] and uninfected cows for FIT, CR and age were statistically different (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the difference between persistently infected and uninfected heifers for FSA or CR did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Even though, FSA of pregnant persistently infected or uninfected heifers was not different (p > 0.05), there was a difference between the age and FIT of persistently infected and uninfected cows (p < 0.001). However, pregnancy was not detected in any of the persistently infected cows. In conclusion, seropositivity for BVDV did not affect fertility of cows or heifers. Although, differences in fertility between persistently infected and uninfected pregnant cows and between persistently infected and uninfected non-pregnant cows were present, fertility of heifers was not affected by BVDV persistency.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/AVB0606467Ken_US
dc.identifier.endpage477en_US
dc.identifier.issn0567-8315en_US
dc.identifier.issn1820-7448en_US
dc.identifier.issue05.06.2020en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage467en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2298/AVB0606467K
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/20722
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000242961900010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDE GRUYTER POLAND SP ZOOen_US
dc.relation.ispartofACTA VETERINARIA-BEOGRADen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectcowen_US
dc.subjectheiferen_US
dc.subjectbovine viral diarrhea virusen_US
dc.subjectfertilityen_US
dc.subjectELISAen_US
dc.titleThe effect of infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus on the fertility of cows and heifersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu