Push-out bonding strengths of four different dowel systems luted with two different adhesive systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOrucoglu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Necla
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Nilgun
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Bora
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:58:27Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis in vitro study investigates the bonding capacity of resin cements to dowels, using the push-out bonding strength of four different dowel systems, namely, stainless steel dowels (SSD), resin-supported polyethylene fiber dowels (RSPFD), zirconia dowels (ZD), and superpost glass fiber dowels (GFD), luted in root canals, using two different resin cements, namely, Multilink Automix Cement and Clearfil Esthetic Cement. Ninety-six maxillary central incisor teeth were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the roots were treated endodontically. Then the roots were placed into four groups, based on the dowel systems used. The roots were further placed into two subgroups, based on the cement type used as subgroup A and subgroup B. Push-out bonding tests were performed on the bonded specimens, which were cut into 1mm thick sections. A two-way ANOVA test and Tukey's HSD tests were performed. The push-out bonding strength values for SSD, ZD, and RSPFD were not significantly different (p>0.05). The means for GFD were significantly higher than the means for ZD (p<0.05) when Multilink Automix Cement was used. However, when Clearfil Esthetic Cement was used, the means for RSPFD were significantly higher (p<0.001) than the means for the other systems. When Clearfil Esthetic Cement was used, the RSPF dowel system provided significantly higher bonding strength values than the other systems.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2014.958911en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2315en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616en_US
dc.identifier.issue22-23en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2305en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2014.958911
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/31100
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000343668000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectdowel systemsen_US
dc.subjectadhesionen_US
dc.subjectpush-out bonding strengthen_US
dc.subject19: Sealantsen_US
dc.subject3: Techniques for the measurement of adhesion, including nondestructive testingen_US
dc.titlePush-out bonding strengths of four different dowel systems luted with two different adhesive systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu