Endoluminal Bariatric Interventions : Where do we stand ? Where are we going ?

dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorOkoh, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorRoach, Emir C.
dc.contributor.authorOlayan, May
dc.contributor.authorShatnawei, Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:05:55Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:05:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground : Obesity is an epidemic leading to high morbidity, mortality, and therefore health-related costs. Thus, there is a huge need for development of safe and effective treatments. Even though success rates of conservative methods are highly limited, the surgical approaches lead to major complications in as many as 25% of the patients. In this study, we aimed to review the currently available, less-invasive, endoscopic bariatric techniques which provides an option to reduce the risks of the patients and the medical costs. Methods : A systematic literature review through Pubmed and Medline was performed to find the studies on this topic, and all controlled clinical trials, case reports, and case series were reviewed. Results : Endoluminal bariatric interventions include restrictive, malabsorptive approaches, and other techniques including transpyloric shuttle, botulinum toxin, gastric pacing and vagal nerve stimulation. Restrictive procedures act by limiting the gastric volume and leading to early satiety, while malabsorptive procedures create a malabsorption state. Transpyloric shuttle is a device decreasing the rate of gastric emptying. Botox injection causes a delay in gastric emptying, and vagal nerve stimulation modulates eating behavior. Conclusion : Endoluminal bariatric techniques can become the primary choice of therapy in the near future for bariatric care.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage423en_US
dc.identifier.issn1784-3227en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26712053en_US
dc.identifier.startpage415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/32102
dc.identifier.volume78en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000373452000009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN-UCLen_US
dc.relation.ispartofACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectbariatricen_US
dc.subjectendoluminalen_US
dc.subjectendoscopicen_US
dc.subjectobesityen_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.titleEndoluminal Bariatric Interventions : Where do we stand ? Where are we going ?en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US

Dosyalar