II. Meşrutiyet Dönemi Romanında “Türk” ve Türklük
| dc.contributor.author | Solak, Ömer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-10T09:04:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-10T09:04:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Türkçe ve Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Batılılar nezdinde Türk imajına odaklanan çalışmalarda genelde Avrupalıların Türkleri; tarihten kaynaklanan, eksik bilgilenmeden doğan ve bugünkü Türkiye gerçeklerine tam olarak uymayan bir takım önyargılarla değerlendirdiği sonucuna varılır. Gerek Türk edebiyatında yabancıların; gerekse yabancı edebiyatlarda Türklerin imajı ile ilgili çalışmalarda aynı önyargıdan söz edilir. Bu çalışmada ise bizzat Türk edebiyatındaki Türk’ün imgesi söz konusu edilmiştir. Bu amaçla siyasal ve toplumsal hayatımızın hızlı değişimler yaşadığı II. Meşrutiyet (1908–1912) döneminde Türk'ün nasıl bir toplumsal tipi temsil ettiği; bir Osmanlı/Türk aydını olan yazarlarımızın imparatorluğun aslî unsuru Türkleri nasıl bir kimlik içinde düşündükleri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada incelenen altı eser, dönemin tarihsel arka planı ve yazarların bu konuda benimsedikleri ideoloji ile de ilişkilendirilerek incelenmiştir. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Batılılar nezdinde Türk imajına odaklanan çalışmalarda genelde Avrupalıların Türkleri; tarihten kaynaklanan, eksik bilgilenmeden doğan ve bugünkü Türkiye gerçeklerine tam olarak uymayan bir takım önyargılarla değerlendirdiği sonucuna varılır. Gerek Türk edebiyatında yabancıların; gerekse yabancı edebiyatlarda Türklerin imajı ile ilgili çalışmalarda aynı önyargıdan söz edilir. Bu çalışmada ise bizzat Türk edebiyatındaki Türk’ün imgesi söz konusu edilmiştir. Bu amaçla siyasal ve toplumsal hayatımızın hızlı değişimler yaşadığı II. Meşrutiyet (1908–1912) döneminde Türk'ün nasıl bir toplumsal tipi temsil ettiği; bir Osmanlı/Türk aydını olan yazarlarımızın imparatorluğun aslî unsuru Türkleri nasıl bir kimlik içinde düşündükleri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada incelenen altı eser, dönemin tarihsel arka planı ve yazarların bu konuda benimsedikleri ideoloji ile de ilişkilendirilerek incelenmiştir. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Europeans are prejudiced about Turks and history or the reality of today’s Turkey due to lack of knowledge about. European Cultures are full of prejudice about Turks. This situation prevents of being Turkish peoples image. After in this study the image of Turks in Europe is mentioned shortly. In our literature the Turkish style is tried to find out. Because of that, “Turk was representing which social type in II. Meşrutiyet –Conditional Monarchy- period (1908–1912) that our social life was formed rapidly in this period and emperorship was going to end? Why did our writers think about Turks that possessed an identity of Ottoman/Turks on Ottoman Turkish novels? The Changing image of Turks is followed. During that time example novels related with our subject was studied. The Political power was considering Turkish identity increasingly in II. Meşrûtiyet. Is that so was this manner reflected that period’s novels. Due to attributions about six novels was written different writer that was studied chronologically. The changing image of Turkish and Anatolian Turkish element was determined in this way. In this article we tried to behave on the image of the Turkish type in society. We didn’t compare the dramatis persona or their circle each other. Ottoman Empire is a tolerant state in the classical period. However this is restricted tolerance that every ethnic component perceives where they will stop. Turks are main component of the empire. But this is a important question that what is role of Turks against the other ethnics. It can be seen that the word of “turk” means “vulgar, rude, peasant” for the Moslem/Turk ruling class. In 19’Th century, Tanzimat create own intellectuals. And they noticed their ethnic Turkish origins; they worked on Turkish language, history and culture at first time. The Political Party of Ittihat ve Terakki (Union and Progress) who came into power with the revolution of the 2’Th Meşrutiyet (Conditional Monarchy) had Turkish nationalistic politics. And they governed the Empire by using these politics between 1908 - 1918. But in six novels which were published between 1908-1912, there are not positive meanings of Turkish identity. In these novels Turk is still can be seen as a “provincial, vulgar and ignorant” by the Moslem/Turk Ottoman people who settled in Istanbul. And this reality demonstrates that political actions had influence on literature in a little later. On the other hand, Turkish identity was evaluated in six novels which were written in II. Meşrûtiyet. These novels are Sefalet, Küçük Paşa, Müsebbip, Şıpsevdi, Nurhayat, Salon Köşelerinde. In Sefalet, A family from Istanbul consider about a “Yoruk” girl Yakut as vulgar because of the provincial origins of her. And they don’t accept willingly her. In Küçük Paşa was narrated Selime came from a little village in Anatolia, lives in a Paşha’s mansion. But Selime’s little son (Salih) will be refuse by the villagers of Selime later. Author Tepeyran tell the disagreement between Anatolia and Istanbul. Because of both Anatolia and Istanbul hadn’t known well each other. In Müsebbip was narrated Balkans War. People from Istanbul don’t accept willingly Turkish immigrants of war. Because, they couldn’t understand how act as a nation in these days. Şıpsevdi is a novel of social satire. Author Gürpınar try to tell how the nobles of Istanbul act to Anatolians and their culture in this novel. In Nurhayat, Ziya as child from Anatolia was ridicule by his friends in the school in Istanbul. They consider comical his behaviors. In the novel of Salon Köşelerinde, Şekip was a refined person of the high society. And he fell in love. Lydia was an English merchant’s girl. In order to call her attention, Şekip tried to be as Turkish nationalist. And he tried to show Turkish culture and civilization. In this way, Şekip found out his Turkish identity. Briefly, in this period Moslem/Ottoman/Istanbulian/Turk people count other components of the empire as being alien or “other” –especially Turks living the parts of a country outside its big cities- . This being an alien or foreigner was clear in this period. Thus we don’t explain this situation as tension between center and province. Near the time of Mesrutiyet, being a Turk would come to mean positive associations. And this affects the modern Turkish Republic’s cultural an identical codes. In spite of political tendency of the period, the novels of second Mesrutiyet period don’t stress on Turk sufficiently. And they don’t give these novels priority. Also it is clear that the Turkist political policy of that period of times wasn’t agreed with by novelist of the same time. Assuming the literature follows the political tendency from behind, this situation will be explained a little. When the empire collapsed tragically and in a very short time; a new understanding came into power. And according to them, being a Turk is not only wouldn’t be made fit into the Istanbul but also should be think with the deep history and wide geography of the Turks. In addition to this, they got Anatolian Turkish identity established in the center of this understanding. In respect of Tanzimat, Edebiyat-Cedide and second Mesrutiyet’s novels, a dominant character of “native citizen” wasn’t to be only “Turk”. Furthermore this definition of native citizen was far away from definition of today’s Turkishness. Moslem/ Ottoman/Istanbulian/Turk counts all of other components which aren’t similar to their cultural characteristics (outfits, taste of entertainment, refined Ottoman language) as an alien. And being alien is clear as much as it can’t be explained. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Europeans are prejudiced about Turks and history or the reality of today’s Turkey due to lack of knowledge about. European Cultures are full of prejudice about Turks. This situation prevents of being Turkish peoples image. After in this study the image of Turks in Europe is mentioned shortly. In our literature the Turkish style is tried to find out. Because of that, “Turk was representing which social type in II. Meşrutiyet –Conditional Monarchy- period (1908–1912) that our social life was formed rapidly in this period and emperorship was going to end? Why did our writers think about Turks that possessed an identity of Ottoman/Turks on Ottoman Turkish novels? The Changing image of Turks is followed. During that time example novels related with our subject was studied. The Political power was considering Turkish identity increasingly in II. Meşrûtiyet. Is that so was this manner reflected that period’s novels. Due to attributions about six novels was written different writer that was studied chronologically. The changing image of Turkish and Anatolian Turkish element was determined in this way. In this article we tried to behave on the image of the Turkish type in society. We didn’t compare the dramatis persona or their circle each other. Ottoman Empire is a tolerant state in the classical period. However this is restricted tolerance that every ethnic component perceives where they will stop. Turks are main component of the empire. But this is a important question that what is role of Turks against the other ethnics. It can be seen that the word of “turk” means “vulgar, rude, peasant” for the Moslem/Turk ruling class. In 19’Th century, Tanzimat create own intellectuals. And they noticed their ethnic Turkish origins; they worked on Turkish language, history and culture at first time. The Political Party of Ittihat ve Terakki (Union and Progress) who came into power with the revolution of the 2’Th Meşrutiyet (Conditional Monarchy) had Turkish nationalistic politics. And they governed the Empire by using these politics between 1908 - 1918. But in six novels which were published between 1908-1912, there are not positive meanings of Turkish identity. In these novels Turk is still can be seen as a “provincial, vulgar and ignorant” by the Moslem/Turk Ottoman people who settled in Istanbul. And this reality demonstrates that political actions had influence on literature in a little later. On the other hand, Turkish identity was evaluated in six novels which were written in II. Meşrûtiyet. These novels are Sefalet, Küçük Paşa, Müsebbip, Şıpsevdi, Nurhayat, Salon Köşelerinde. In Sefalet, A family from Istanbul consider about a “Yoruk” girl Yakut as vulgar because of the provincial origins of her. And they don’t accept willingly her. In Küçük Paşa was narrated Selime came from a little village in Anatolia, lives in a Paşha’s mansion. But Selime’s little son (Salih) will be refuse by the villagers of Selime later. Author Tepeyran tell the disagreement between Anatolia and Istanbul. Because of both Anatolia and Istanbul hadn’t known well each other. In Müsebbip was narrated Balkans War. People from Istanbul don’t accept willingly Turkish immigrants of war. Because, they couldn’t understand how act as a nation in these days. Şıpsevdi is a novel of social satire. Author Gürpınar try to tell how the nobles of Istanbul act to Anatolians and their culture in this novel. In Nurhayat, Ziya as child from Anatolia was ridicule by his friends in the school in Istanbul. They consider comical his behaviors. In the novel of Salon Köşelerinde, Şekip was a refined person of the high society. And he fell in love. Lydia was an English merchant’s girl. In order to call her attention, Şekip tried to be as Turkish nationalist. And he tried to show Turkish culture and civilization. In this way, Şekip found out his Turkish identity. Briefly, in this period Moslem/Ottoman/Istanbulian/Turk people count other components of the empire as being alien or “other” –especially Turks living the parts of a country outside its big cities- . This being an alien or foreigner was clear in this period. Thus we don’t explain this situation as tension between center and province. Near the time of Mesrutiyet, being a Turk would come to mean positive associations. And this affects the modern Turkish Republic’s cultural an identical codes. In spite of political tendency of the period, the novels of second Mesrutiyet period don’t stress on Turk sufficiently. And they don’t give these novels priority. Also it is clear that the Turkist political policy of that period of times wasn’t agreed with by novelist of the same time. Assuming the literature follows the political tendency from behind, this situation will be explained a little. When the empire collapsed tragically and in a very short time; a new understanding came into power. And according to them, being a Turk is not only wouldn’t be made fit into the Istanbul but also should be think with the deep history and wide geography of the Turks. In addition to this, they got Anatolian Turkish identity established in the center of this understanding. In respect of Tanzimat, Edebiyat-Cedide and second Mesrutiyet’s novels, a dominant character of “native citizen” wasn’t to be only “Turk”. Furthermore this definition of native citizen was far away from definition of today’s Turkishness. Moslem/ Ottoman/Istanbulian/Turk counts all of other components which aren’t similar to their cultural characteristics (outfits, taste of entertainment, refined Ottoman language) as an alien. And being alien is clear as much as it can’t be explained. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Solak, Ö., (2009). II. Meşrutiyet Dönemi Romanında “Türk” ve Türklük. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21, 419-429. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 429 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2667-4750 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 21 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 419 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/45675 | |
| dc.institutionauthor | Solak, Ömer | |
| dc.language.iso | tr | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
| dc.subject | Türk tipi | en_US |
| dc.subject | Türk tipi | en_US |
| dc.subject | imaj | en_US |
| dc.subject | imaj | en_US |
| dc.subject | meşrutiyet dönemi | en_US |
| dc.subject | meşrutiyet dönemi | en_US |
| dc.subject | roman | en_US |
| dc.subject | roman | en_US |
| dc.subject | Turkish type | en_US |
| dc.subject | Turkish type | en_US |
| dc.subject | image | en_US |
| dc.subject | image | en_US |
| dc.subject | etnisite | en_US |
| dc.subject | etnisite | en_US |
| dc.subject | the literature of 2’Th Conditional Monarchy | en_US |
| dc.subject | the literature of 2’Th Conditional Monarchy | en_US |
| dc.title | II. Meşrutiyet Dönemi Romanında “Türk” ve Türklük | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Turkish Type And Turkishness In 2’th Conditional Monarchy Novel | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
