Effect of different surface treatments on the shear and microtensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAltunsoy, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBotsali, Murat Selim
dc.contributor.authorKorkut, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKucukyilmaz, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorSener, Yagmur
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:50:12Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (mTBS) and shear bond strength (SBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin. Materials and methods. Fifty-two extracted human molars were flattened to obtain dentin surfaces. For SBS assessment 40 teeth were divided into four groups according to their surface treatments (acid etching, Er: YAG laser QSP mode, Er: YAG laser MSP mode and control-SiC) (n = 10). A plastic cylinder was placed over the differently treated dentin surfaces and RMGIC was placed into the rings and polymerized. Twelve teeth were used for the mu TBS test. The treated dentin surfaces described above were restored with 4 mm high RMGIC and light cured; then, the specimens were sectioned into serial sticks (n = 15) and mu TBS and SBS were tested for failure in a testing machine with a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (alpha = 0.05). Results. Acid etching showed significantly higher SBS than the other groups (p < 0.05). Er: YAG QSP and MSP-treated groups showed higher SBS values than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Er: YAG MSP showed the highest mu TBS value followed by acid etching, whereas the control group exhibited the lowest value (p < 0.05) and the differences between the control group and Er: YAG QSP were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions. The application of Er: YAG MSP mode and acid etching to dentin can be used for improving the bond strength of RMGIC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/00016357.2014.919664en_US
dc.identifier.endpage879en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357en_US
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24844786en_US
dc.identifier.startpage874en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.919664
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/30769
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000344330400045en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectacid etchingen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG lasersen_US
dc.subjectglass ionomeren_US
dc.subjectshear strengthen_US
dc.subjecttensile strengthen_US
dc.titleEffect of different surface treatments on the shear and microtensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentinen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu