Analysis of Suprapubic and Transrectal Measurements in Assessment of Prostate Dimensions and Volume Is Transrectal Ultrasonography Really Necessary for Prostate Measurements?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOzden, Eriz
dc.contributor.authorGogus, Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Ozcan
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Onder
dc.contributor.authorOezdiler, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:37:51Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation of suprapubic ultrasonography and transrectal ultrasonography in measurements of prostate dimension and volume. Materials and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with lower urinary tract symptoms were examined by suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography modalities in a same session. Measurements of the 3 dimensions of the prostate (anteroposterior, transverse, and craniocaudal) and its volume performed by suprapubic ultrasonography were compared with the corresponding measurements by transrectal ultrasonography in order to determine the correlation of the measurements. Prostate volumes were calculated using the ellipsoid formula. Data were further analyzed in subgroups according to prostate volumes smaller or larger than 50 mL, measured by suprapubic ultrasonography. Results: The mean prostate volume of the 100 patients, measured by suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography were 65.9 +/- 35.8 mL and 62.5 +/- 32.0 mL, respectively (r = 0.94; P < .001). The craniocaudal diameters had the strongest correlation among dimension measurements (r = 0.89; P < .001). Suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography measurements also showed significant correlations for both prostates smaller or larger than 50 mL. Eighty-five percent of the patients had both volume measurements under or above this limit. Conclusion: There was strong correlation between suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography measurements of the prostate sizes, including both for volume or specific dimension measurements.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-546Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19711277en_US
dc.identifier.startpage208en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/23276
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269832900014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUROL & NEPHROL RES CTR-UNRCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUROLOGY JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectultrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectorgan sizeen_US
dc.subjectprostaticen_US
dc.subjectprostatic hyperplasiaen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Suprapubic and Transrectal Measurements in Assessment of Prostate Dimensions and Volume Is Transrectal Ultrasonography Really Necessary for Prostate Measurements?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu