Evaluation of antibacterial effects of contemporary orthodontic bonding materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaka, Zeliha Muge
dc.contributor.authorEldeniz, Ayce Unverdi
dc.contributor.authorGuneser, Mehmet Burak
dc.contributor.authorBasciftci, Faruk Ayhan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:41:43Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial effects of five orthodontic bonding materials commonly used in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: The antibacterial effects of five orthodontic bonding materials were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus salivarius by direct contact test (DCT). Using the DCT technique, quintet specimens of Transbond XT, Blugloo, Grengloo, Light Bond, and Opal Bond were applied to the bottom and the walls of the five wells of a 96-microtiter plate with a height of 2 mm. Samples were prepared in two sets: 1-day samples and 7-day samples. Ten microliters of bacterial suspension were added to each well for direct contact with each material for 1h at 37 degrees C. Bacterial growth was then measured in a microplate spectrophotometer hourly at 600 nm for 24h. Five uncoated wells with identical inoculum sizes served as positive controls. The data obtained at the end of 24h was statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and post hoc comparisons were done using Tamhane's T2 test. Results: Blugloo generally showed better antibacterial activity than the other materials. Transbond XT did not show any antibacterial activity. There was a statistically significant difference between Transbond XT and Light Bond in the 1-day sample against S. mutans (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found among the other groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Blugloo had the most potent antibacterial activity against S. salivarious.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2017.1307798en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2523en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616en_US
dc.identifier.issue22en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2515en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1307798
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/35088
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000407481800009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial effecten_US
dc.subjectdirect contact testen_US
dc.subjectorthodontic bonding materialsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of antibacterial effects of contemporary orthodontic bonding materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu