COMPARISON OF SELECTIVE SPINAL ANESTHESIA AND LOCAL INFILTRATION ANESTHESIA UNDER MONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE TECHNIQUES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ANORECTAL DAY SURGERY

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Ates
dc.contributor.authorApiliogullari, Seza
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBodur, Said
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:14:00Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:14:00Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this prospective, randomized study, we aimed to compare the two techniques that we employ routinely in our clinic; selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) and local infiltration anesthesia under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in terms of patient and surgeon satisfaction, time for ambulation (AT), time to be ready for discharge (RD). Material and Method: In group I (n=30), spinal anesthesia was achieved with 2.5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position. In group II (n=30), 0.25 mg.kg-1 of hetamine followed by 1-2mg. kg-1 of propofol were administered intravenously for sedation. Local infiltration anesthesia consisting of 5ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 5ml of 2% prilocaine. Patient and surgeon satisfaction, AT, RD and side effects were compared. Results: The mean AT and RD were 38 min and 45 min respectively in group land, 43 mm and 57 min respectively in group II (p<0.05). While the groups were similar in terms of surgeon satisfaction, patient satisfaction was better in group I (p<0.05). Conclusion: When compared to local infiltration anesthesia under MCA, SSA technique provides better patient satisfaction together with shorter AT and RD times.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage66en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-2381en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage61en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/26262
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000293818000013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherNOBEL ILACen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNOBEL MEDICUSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAnorectal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectmonitorized anesthesia careen_US
dc.subjectselective spinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF SELECTIVE SPINAL ANESTHESIA AND LOCAL INFILTRATION ANESTHESIA UNDER MONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE TECHNIQUES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ANORECTAL DAY SURGERYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu