Evaluation of Clinical and Imaging Findings in Children with Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaymakci, Aytekin
dc.contributor.authorGuven, Sirin
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Seher
dc.contributor.authorCiftci, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorGokcan, Recai
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:41:43Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study is an evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT), and Alvarado score (AS) in the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in children. Methods: Records of pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric emergency department (ED) between 2008 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. Patient data from the national electronic health information system was screened and those with complete clinical and imaging findings (AS, preoperative USG and/or CT images) and postoperative pathological diagnosis were included in the study. Results: Study group consisted of 449 children with diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis aged between 3 and 15 years (mean age: 9.20 +/- 2.73 years). Of the total, 428 (95.3%) patients underwent appendectomy and 21 (4.7%) cases were treated conservatively. Mean duration of symptoms was 4.94 +/- 1.84 hours. Pathological evaluation results were negative (i.e., removal of normal appendix) in 36 (8.4%) patients; histopathological diagnosis was acute appendicitis in 392 (91.6%) patients. Perforated appendix was found in 38 (8.5%) patients. In patients with histopathologically confirmed appendicitis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT in diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 96.3%, 55.6%, 92.8%, and 71.4%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of USG were 73.5%, 22.2%, 91.1%, and 69.2%, respectively. Negative appendectomy rate was 6.4% (n = 8) in patients who had preoperative CT scan, and 6.5% (n = 28) in patients who had USG examination. Conclusions: CT has higher sensitivity than USG in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. USG, on the other hand, is widely accessible method and does not use ionizing radiation. Therefore, it may be used as initial radiological imaging method in acute appendicitis. Thin-filter, contrast-unenhanced CT scans may be preferred in cases where clinical signs and USG findings are unclear or controversial.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5812/ijp.10095en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-2142en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-2150en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijp.10095
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/35093
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000416096000016en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKOWSAR CORPen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAlvarado scoreen_US
dc.subjectAppendicitisen_US
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Clinical and Imaging Findings in Children with Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu