Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: Factors affecting the measurements [Aneroid sfigmomanometreyle ölçülen brakiyal arter basincinin santral aortik basinçla karşilaştirilmasi ve farka etki eden faktörler]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKayrak M.
dc.contributor.authorÜlgen M.S.
dc.contributor.authorYazici M.
dc.contributor.authorDemir K.
dc.contributor.authorDo?an Y.
dc.contributor.authorKoç F.
dc.contributor.authorZengin K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:28:31Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We compared brachial artery blood pressures (BP) measured by aneroid sphygmomanometer with ascending aortic blood pressures and evaluated the factors affecting the differences between the two methods. Study design: The study included 463 patients (177 women, 286 men; mean age 60±11 years) undergoing routine coronary angiography. Simultaneously, ascending aortic pressures were measured using a pigtail catheter and brachial artery pressures were measured from the right arm with an aneroid sphygmomanometer. Pulse pressure, fractional pulse pressure, and pulsatility index were calculated from systolic and diastolic BP values. Results: Overall, systolic (-3.1±10 mmHg) and diastolic (+3.0±7.1 mmHg) brachial pressures showed significant deviations from aortic pressures (p=0.001). Although systolic BP did not differ significantly in both methods for men and women, brachial diastolic BP was significantly different in women (+4.8 mmHg, p=0.0001). Brachial diastolic BP showed a greater deviation from the aortic diastolic pressure in patients ?60 years of age (+4.5 mmHg and +1.1 mmHg, respectively; p=0.0001). Deviation of systolic BP in hypertensive patients (-4 mmHg) was greater than that in normotensives (-2.0 mmHg, p=0.04). Deviation of brachial systolic BP was highly correlated with increases in aortic systolic pressure (p=0.0001). Differences between the two methods in systolic (-5.8 mmHg, p=0.01) and diastolic (+4.2 mmHg, p=0.03) BP were significant in patients with coexisting diabetes and hypertension. Body mass index and arm circumference were not correlated with deviations between the two methods. Conclusion: The main factors (female gender, age, hypertension, diabetes) affecting BP differences between the two methods should be considered in clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage246en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5169en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18765967en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage239en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/22796
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectAortaen_US
dc.subjectBlood pressureen_US
dc.subjectBlood pressure determination/methodsen_US
dc.subjectBrachial arteryen_US
dc.subjectHypertensionen_US
dc.subjectSphygmomanometersen_US
dc.titleComparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: Factors affecting the measurements [Aneroid sfigmomanometreyle ölçülen brakiyal arter basincinin santral aortik basinçla karşilaştirilmasi ve farka etki eden faktörler]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu