MICROLEAKAGE OF CERAMIC INLAYS LUTED WITH DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS AND DENTIN ADHESIVES

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUludag, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, A. Nilgun
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:39:15Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:39:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Despite recent advances in adhesive dentistry, resin cement/dentin adhesive combinations are not able to prevent microleakage in ceramic inlays. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in large Class 11 cavities is satisfactory in enamel margins, but microleakage in dentin margins remains a concern. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of all-ceramic inlays luted with 2 dual-polymerizing resin cements or 1 auto polymerizing resin cement in combination with different dentin adhesives. Material and methods. One hundred and twenty extracted human mandibular third molars were used in this study. Teeth were prepared to receive Class 11 MOD inlays with enamel gingival margins on 1 proximal surface and dentin gingival margins on the other surface. One hundred and twenty prepared teeth were divided into 3 groups of 40; 1 group for each resin cement: RelyX ARC, Variolink 11, or Panavia 21. Each of the 3 groups were further divided into 4 dentin adhesive groups; Single Bond, ExciTE DSC, ED Primer, or Admira Bond. Each of the resin cements were used in combination with the 4 dentin adhesives, and IPS Empress ceramic inlays were placed with 12 different cement/adhesive combinations. After 1000 thermal cycles In a 5 degrees-55 degrees C water bath with a dwell time of 30 seconds, all specimens were subjected to cyclic axial mechanical loading. Then the restored teeth were stored in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. The extent of dye penetration along the margins was measured with a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification. The data were evaluated statistically using repeated-measures ANOVA and Duncan tests (alpha=.05). Results. Microleakage at dentin margins was greater than that at enamel margins (P<.05) for all groups. Variolink 11 and RelyX ARC resin cements showed significantly lower microleakage results than Panavia 21 with all dentin adhesives in enamel margins. For dentin margins, Variolink II/Admira Bond combination showed the lowest microleakage value in dentin (P<.05). Conclusions. The overall microleakage at the enamel margins was significantly less than at the dentin margins (P<.05). Panavia 21 showed higher microleakage values than Variolink 11 and RelyX ARC in enamel margins. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:235-241)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-Xen_US
dc.identifier.endpage241en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19782826en_US
dc.identifier.startpage235en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/23680
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000270964000007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.titleMICROLEAKAGE OF CERAMIC INLAYS LUTED WITH DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS AND DENTIN ADHESIVESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu