Comparison of the mechanical and biological properties of self-adhering materials
dc.contributor.author | Ulker, H. Esra | |
dc.contributor.author | Erkan, Ali Ihsan | |
dc.contributor.author | Gunaydin, Nuray | |
dc.contributor.author | Kahvecioglu, Firdevs | |
dc.contributor.author | Ulker, Mustafa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T19:23:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T19:23:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.department | Selçuk Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to compare the Vickers hardness numbers (VHNs), roughness numbers (RNs) and biological compatibility of glass carbomer (Glass Fill), resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC) and self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise Flow) materials. Materials and methods: Disc-shaped specimens of test materials (n=15/group) were prepared, and VHNs and RNs were determined after 24h. A direct contact test was used for cytotoxicity evaluation. Cell viability was measured for 24h post-exposition with a photometric test (MTT assay; n=16). Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance with a post hoc Tukey's test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test (p<0.05). Results: Fuji II LC had the highest VHN. The VHN of Fuji II LC differed significantly from those of the other materials (p<0.05). The RNs of Fuji II and Glass Fill were higher than that of Vertise Flow (p<0.05). The self-adhering materials were not significantly cytotoxic compared with the control group (p>0.05). Conclusions: The materials tested in this study showed a similar lack of cytotoxicity. The VHN of Fuji II LC was the highest, and the RN of Vertise Flow was the lowest. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01694243.2016.1140704 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1130 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-4243 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1568-5616 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1119 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1140704 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/33387 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000371035400008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.selcuk | 20240510_oaig | en_US |
dc.subject | Vickers microhardness | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-adhering materials | en_US |
dc.subject | roughness and cytotoxicity | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the mechanical and biological properties of self-adhering materials | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |