The effects of low dose levobupivacaine with or without sufentanil intrathecally in transurethral resection of prostate [Transütretral prostat rezeksiyon cerrahisinde sufentanil ile beraber veya tek olarak düşük doz levobupivakainin etkisi]

dc.contributor.authorBorazan H.
dc.contributor.authorDavarci I.
dc.contributor.authorKeçecio?lu A.
dc.contributor.authorOtelcio?lu S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T18:22:05Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T18:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of levobupivacaine alone and levobupivacaine/sufentanil combination in spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in elderly patients. Method: Ninety patients were randomly assigned into two groups to receive either levobupivacaine 10 mg (Group L) or levobupivacaine 7.5 mg combined with 2.5 ?g sufentanil (Group LS) for spinal anesthesia. The dermatome level and upper level of sensory blockade, time to develop a sensory block to T10, duration of sensory and motor blockade, Bromage score at the end of surgery, two- segment sensory regression time, and side effects were recorded. The quality of anesthesia was evaluated and rated after the surgery. Result: There were no significant differences between groups in demographic data or hemodynamic variables in terms of sensory blockade, onset time of sensory blockade to T10 dermatome, and two-segment regression. Bromage score at the end of surgery was significantly higher in Group L (p<0.05). The number of patients with maximum motor block was significantly higher in Group L (p<0.05). Complete motor block resolution time was longer in Group L (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in side effects between groups except for pruritus (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in quality of anesthesia. Conclusion: It was shown that 10 mg levobupivacaine and 7.5 mg levobupivacaine combined with 2.5 ?g sufentanil were considered to be convenient for clinical use in TURP surgery with spinal anesthesia; both treatments provided adequate anesthesia with hemodynamic stability in elderly patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage140en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-3889en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage134en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/27132
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of General Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectEldersen_US
dc.subjectLevobupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectSpinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectSufentanilen_US
dc.titleThe effects of low dose levobupivacaine with or without sufentanil intrathecally in transurethral resection of prostate [Transütretral prostat rezeksiyon cerrahisinde sufentanil ile beraber veya tek olarak düşük doz levobupivakainin etkisi]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar