Burst failure load of composite pressure vessels

dc.contributor.authorOnder, Aziz
dc.contributor.authorSayman, Onur
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorTarakcioglu, Necmettin
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:37:59Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, optimal angle-ply orientations of symmetric and antisymmetric [0/-0](s) shells designed maximum burst pressure were examined. Burst pressure of filament wound composite pressure vessels under alternating pure internal pressure was investigated. The study deals with the influences of temperature and winding angle on filament Wound composite pressure vessels. Finite element method and experimental approaches were employed to verify the optimum winding angles. An elastic solution procedure based on Lekhnitskii's theory was developed in order to predict the burst failure pressure of the pressure vessels. The Tsai-Wu failure criterion, maximum strain and stress theories were applied for Verifying the burst failure pressure of tubes. The solution was presented and discussed for various orientation angles. Glass reinforced plastic (GRP) pipes were manufactured by E-glass-epoxy and tested for the closed-ended condition. Test specimens had four layers, which had various orientation angles. The layers were Oriented symmetrically and antisymmetrically for, [45 degrees/-45 degrees](s), [55 degrees/-55 degrees](s), [60 degrees/-60 degrees](s), [75 degrees/ -75 degrees](s) and [88 degrees/-88 degrees](s) orientations. For this study, a PLC controlled hydraulic pressure testing machine has been utilized. The hygrothermal and other mechanical properties were measured on E-glass-epoxy composite flat layers. Some analytical and experimental solutions were compared with the finite element solutions, in which commercial software ANSYS 10.0 Was utilized; close results were obtained between analytical and experimental solutions for some orientations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK Research FoundationTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [104M424]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are greatly indebted to the TUBITAK Research Foundation for providing financial support (Project Number: 104M424).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.021en_US
dc.identifier.endpage166en_US
dc.identifier.issn0263-8223en_US
dc.identifier.issn1879-1085en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/23329
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000265007300019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCOMPOSITE STRUCTURESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectComposite pressure vesselsen_US
dc.subjectFilament windingen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectInternal pressureen_US
dc.titleBurst failure load of composite pressure vesselsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar