Evaluation of host resistance inducers and conventional products for fire blight management in loquat and quince

dc.contributor.authorBastas, Kubilay Kurtulus
dc.contributor.authorMaden, Salih
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T17:17:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T17:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractFire blight disease is one of the most destructive diseases of pome fruits. Due to the lack of effective, non-phytotoxic and publicly acceptable materials for controlling fire blight in pome fruit trees, new strategies to manage Erwinia amylovora fire blight are being sought. The resistance-inducing compounds prohexadione-Ca, harpin protein and benzothiadiazole (acibenzolar-S-methyl), the fertilizer humic acid, the bactericides streptomycin and copper salts, and combinations of copper with chemicals were evaluated for their ability to control fire blight on quince and loquat cultivars. Prohexadione-Ca was applied at a rate of 125 mg L-1 at two shoot lengths (6-12 cm and 15-20 cm), while benzothiadiazole + metalaxyl (135 mg L-1) and harpin (50 mg L-1) were applied when the shoots measured between 15-20 cm, and again at 30-35 cm. On loquat cv. Cukurgobek, benzothiadiazole + metalaxyl showed about 60% effectiveness. The addition of copper salts reduced the effectiveness of benzothiadiazole + metalaxyl. On quince cultivars, streptomycin (P <= 0.05) was the most effective treatment during both years, followed by the harpin protein alone and in combination with copper salts. Prohexadione-Ca, benzothiadiazole + metalaxyl, and harpin protein applications reduced disease severity on inoculated shoots compared with copper and untreated controls. Prohexadione-Ca reduced both shoot length and shoot blight on the two hosts. Humic acid applications were ineffective in controlling fire blight on loquat and quince cultivars. Quince cv. E me showed lower disease severity than cv. Ekmek (P <= 0.05). The use of resistance-inducing substances during the early phase of shoot growth may offer a means of managing the shoot blight phase of fire blight disease on quince and loquat.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7202/018954aren_US
dc.identifier.endpage101en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9511en_US
dc.identifier.issn1710-1603en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage93en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7202/018954ar
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/21390
dc.identifier.volume88en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000258650000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQUEBEC SOC PROTECT PLANTSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPHYTOPROTECTIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectCydoniaen_US
dc.subjectEriobotryaen_US
dc.subjectErwinia amylovoraen_US
dc.subjectgrowth regulationen_US
dc.subjectsystemic acquired resistanceen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of host resistance inducers and conventional products for fire blight management in loquat and quinceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar